These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 405905)

  • 21. The acceptance of background noise in adult cochlear implant users.
    Plyler PN; Bahng J; von Hapsburg D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):502-15. PubMed ID: 18367692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Model of an endocochlear multicanal implant. Results].
    Bosch J; Prades J; Colomina R; Monferré A
    An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am; 1978; 5(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 727409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Electric stimulation of the cochlea].
    Bogomil'skiĭ MR
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1976; (6):81-5. PubMed ID: 798401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech recognition with the bone-anchored hearing aid determined objectively and subjectively.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 8168444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Electroacoustic measures of present prostheses.
    Wolf RV; Bilger RC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 2 Suppl 38):61-9. PubMed ID: 405912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sound-field hearing tests.
    Wolf RV
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 3 Suppl 38):70-5. PubMed ID: 405913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital hearing aids for high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss: preliminary experience with the RetroX device.
    Barbara M; Bandiera G; Serra B; Marrone V; Tarentini S; Pinna JC; Ronchetti F; Graziadio M; Monini S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):693-6. PubMed ID: 16012028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Occlusion of the round window by the implantation of an air silicone prosthesis].
    Novotny Z
    Acta Otorinolaryngol Iber Am; 1970; 21(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 5433541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Restoration of binaural hearing with the audiant implant following acoustic neuroma surgery.
    Pulec JL
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 8168445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preparing for communication interactions: the value of anticipatory strategies for adults with hearing impairment.
    Tye-Murray N
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):430-5. PubMed ID: 1573881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cochlear implants: technical and clinical implications.
    Glattke TJ
    Laryngoscope; 1976 Sep; 86(9):1351-8. PubMed ID: 957846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Auditory brainstem implant in neurofibromatosis type 2 and non-neurofibromatosis type 2 patients.
    Grayeli AB; Kalamarides M; Bouccara D; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1140-6. PubMed ID: 18849886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rehabilitation of high-frequency hearing loss with the RetroX auditory implant.
    Garin P; Genard F; Galle C; Fameree MH; Jamart J; Gersdorff M
    B-ENT; 2005; 1(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15999671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The cochlear implant; basic principles.
    Brackmann DE
    Laryngoscope; 1976 Mar; 86(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 1256212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of benefit from vibrotactile aid and cochlear implant for postlinguistically deaf adults.
    Skinner MW; Binzer SM; Fredrickson JM; Smith PG; Holden TA; Holden LK; Juelich MF; Turner BA
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Oct; 98(10):1092-9. PubMed ID: 3172956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluations of 3M/House single-channel and nucleus multichannel cochlear implants.
    Cunningham JK; Stoeckert JA
    Am J Otol; 1992 Sep; 13(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 1443081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.