102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 405914)
21. Auditory detection of spondaic words in wide-band noise by adults with normal hearing and by children with profound hearing losses.
Erber NP
J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):372-81. PubMed ID: 5558093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
Hansen M
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Indications and results of the multichannel cochlear implant.
Pialoux P; Chouard CH; Meyer B; Fugain C
Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(3-4):185-9. PubMed ID: 442998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds.
Hygge S; Rönnberg J; Larsby B; Arlinger S
J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 35(1):208-15. PubMed ID: 1370969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Hearing rehabilitation, possibilities and limitations].
Ritsma RJ
Ned Tijdschr Gerontol; 1979 Aug; 10(3):144-51. PubMed ID: 492596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing.
Tye-Murray N; Sommers MS; Spehar B
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):656-68. PubMed ID: 17804980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparing implants with hearing aids in profoundly deaf children.
Geers AE
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):150-4. PubMed ID: 9334758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The RetroX auditory implant for high-frequency hearing loss.
Garin P; Genard F; Galle C; Jamart J
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Jul; 25(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 15241230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.
Eddington DK; Dobelle WH; Brackmann DE; Mladejovsky MG; Parkin JL
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978; 87(6 Pt 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 736424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.
Weiss R; Leinung M; Baumann U; Weißgerber T; Rader T; Stöver T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2107-2115. PubMed ID: 28032241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of age on speech intelligibility in babble noise.
Cerny L; Vokral J; Dlouha O
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2018; 78(2):140-147. PubMed ID: 30019705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Clinical observations in electric stimulation of the ear (author's transl)].
Burian K
Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1979; 223(1):139-66. PubMed ID: 383059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Directional audiometry. VI. Directional speech audiometry in patients with practical deafness in one ear and impaired hearing in the other ear treated with hearing aids.
Tonning FM
Acta Otolaryngol; 1972 Sep; 74(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 5080253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Use of frequency-shifted/time-compressed speech with hearing-impaired children.
Beasley DS; Mosher NL; Orchik DJ
Audiology; 1976; 15(5):395-406. PubMed ID: 938345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Perception of sound through direct oscillation of the stapes using a piezoelectric ceramic bimorph.
Yanagihara N; Gyo K; Suzuki K; Araki H
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1983; 92(3 Pt 1):223-7. PubMed ID: 6859740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
