BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 405914)

  • 41. Speech perception in noise with BICROS hearing aids.
    Del Dot J; Hickson LM; O'Connell B
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 1488613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Long-term clinical results of the partially implantable piezoelectric middle ear implant.
    Suzuki J; Kodera K; Nagai K; Yabe T
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 8168441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Early clinical results: SOUNDTEC implantable hearing device phase II study.
    Hough JV; Dyer RK; Matthews P; Wood MW
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11192875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Safety limit warning levels for the avoidance of excessive sound amplification to protect against further hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):829-836. PubMed ID: 28687060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Implanted auditory prosthesis: an evaluation of subjects presently fitted with cochlear implants.
    Bilger RC; Black FO; Hopkinson NT; Myers EN
    Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1977; 84(4 Pt 1):ORL-677-82. PubMed ID: 898520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Speech recognition with the bone-anchored hearing aid determined objectively and subjectively.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 8168444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
    Dieudonné B; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Observations and statistical studies on the correlation between thresholds for pure sounds, filtered bands of white noise, and speech audiometry tests].
    de Reynier JP; Bernath O
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1976; 97(3-4):109-16. PubMed ID: 1005964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Medical and surgical considerations for implantable hearing prosthetic devices.
    Weber PC
    Am J Audiol; 2002 Dec; 11(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 12691225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Hearing aid evaluation for persons with postlingual hearing levels of 90 to 100 dB.
    Fujikawa S; Owens E
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1979 Nov; 105(11):662-5. PubMed ID: 496715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Occlusion of the round window by the implantation of an air silicone prosthesis].
    Novotny Z
    Acta Otorinolaryngol Iber Am; 1970; 21(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 5433541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Indication of direct acoustical cochlea stimulation in comparison to cochlear implants.
    Kludt E; Büchner A; Schwab B; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():185-190. PubMed ID: 26836967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Stickney GS; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1351-61. PubMed ID: 15807023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.