108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 405915)
1. Psychoacoustic evaluation of present prostheses.
Bilger RC
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 3 Suppl 38):92-104. PubMed ID: 405915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Present audiologic status of subjects implanted with auditory prostheses.
Hopkinson NT; Bilger RC; Black FO
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 3 Suppl 38):40-8. PubMed ID: 405909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory prostheses in perspective.
Bilger RC; Black FO
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 2 Suppl 38):3-10. PubMed ID: 405908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Research plan for evaluating subjects presently fitted with implanted auditory prostheses.
Bilger RC; Black FO; Hopkinson NT
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 2 Suppl 38):21-4. PubMed ID: 405906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hearing performance with the auditory prosthesis.
Bilger RC; Hopkinson NT
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 3 Suppl 38):76-91. PubMed ID: 405914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subject acceptance of implanted auditory prosthesis.
Bilger RC; Stenson NR; Payne JL
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 2 Suppl 38):165-76. PubMed ID: 405905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.
Eddington DK; Dobelle WH; Brackmann DE; Mladejovsky MG; Parkin JL
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978; 87(6 Pt 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 736424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech.
Glasberg BR; Moore BC
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1989; 32():1-25. PubMed ID: 2711118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of the auditory prosthesis on postural stability.
Black FO
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 2 Suppl 38):141-64. PubMed ID: 405904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The psychoacoustics of profound hearing impairment.
Rosen S; Faulkner A; Smith DA
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():16-22. PubMed ID: 2356723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve and auditory prostheses: a review of the literature.
Bilger RC
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 2 Suppl 38):11-20. PubMed ID: 405903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of promontory and cochlear implants within a single subject.
Edgerton BJ; House WF; Doyle KJ
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):100-3. PubMed ID: 6805388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical psychophysics. Illustrated by the problem of auditory overload.
de Boer E; Bouwmeester J
Audiology; 1975; 14(4):274-99. PubMed ID: 1147850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.
Dimitrijevic A; John MS; Picton TW
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 14770019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cochlear prosthesis: further clinical observations; preliminary results of physiological studies.
Michelson RP; Merzenich MM; Pettit CR; Schindler RA
Laryngoscope; 1973 Jul; 83(7):1116-22. PubMed ID: 4719358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech recognition in noise, temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing.
Arlinger S; Dryselius H
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():30-7. PubMed ID: 2356736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Relation between comfortable loudness and maximal speech intelligibility in children with sensorineural hearing loss].
Belov IM; Kuks EN; Poliakova SK
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1992; (3):6-9. PubMed ID: 1523777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
