BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 405915)

  • 21. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of subtle mid-frequency auditory dysfunction upon speech discrimination in noise.
    Findlay RC; Denenberg LJ
    Audiology; 1977; 16(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 880129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of low frequency noise up to 100 Hz.
    Schust M
    Noise Health; 2004; 6(23):73-85. PubMed ID: 15273025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sound-field hearing tests.
    Wolf RV
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 3 Suppl 38):70-5. PubMed ID: 405913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Upward spread of masking in normal and abnormal ears].
    Picard M; Couture-Metz F
    Audiology; 1985; 24(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 3994593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Residual inhibition functions in relation to tinnitus spectra and auditory threshold shift.
    Roberts LE; Moffat G; Bosnyak DJ
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2006 Dec; (556):27-33. PubMed ID: 17114139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory filtering and the discrimination of spectral shapes by normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Turner CW; Holte LA; Relkin E
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 3430382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
    Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Random Gap Detection Test and Random Gap Detection Test-Expanded results in children with auditory neuropathy.
    Yalçinkaya F; Muluk NB; Ataş A; Keith RW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Nov; 73(11):1558-63. PubMed ID: 19735949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli.
    Lister J; Tarver K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 15157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
    Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The relative importance of recovery time in compression hearing aids.
    Schweitzer HC; Causey GD
    Audiology; 1977; 16(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 836255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The relationship between stream segregation and frequency discrimination in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Rose MM; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):16-28. PubMed ID: 15925188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Present otologic status of subjects implanted with auditory prostheses.
    Black FO; Myers EN
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 2 Suppl 38):25-39. PubMed ID: 405907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electroacoustic measures of present prostheses.
    Wolf RV; Bilger RC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 2 Suppl 38):61-9. PubMed ID: 405912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Present neuropsychological status of subjects implanted with auditory prostheses.
    Vega A
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 3 Suppl 38):57-60. PubMed ID: 405911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The relation between hearing aid evaluations using magnitude estimation procedure and the speech discrimination ability].
    Hosoi H; Kohno K; Murata K; Ohta F
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1988 May; 91(5):703-9. PubMed ID: 3418440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Present vestibular status of subjects implanted with auditory prostheses.
    Black FO
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 3 Suppl 38):49-56. PubMed ID: 405910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.