These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4059852)

  • 1. Brainstem and cochlea potentials evoked by rarefaction and condensation single-slope stimuli. A preliminary report.
    Gerull G; Mrowinski D; Janssen T; Anft D
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(3):141-50. PubMed ID: 4059852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compound action potentials recorded from the intracranial portion of the auditory nerve in man: effects of stimulus intensity and polarity.
    Møller AR; Jho HD
    Audiology; 1991; 30(3):142-63. PubMed ID: 1953444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory brainstem responses to single-slope stimuli. The influence of steepness and polarity.
    Gerull G; Mrowinski D; Janssen T; Anft D
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 3438705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Click polarity inversion effects upon the human brainstem auditory evoked potential.
    Kevanishvili Z; Aphonchenko V
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 7302521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of cochlear processes in generating Jewett IV and V brain stem potential components].
    Janssen T; Böhnke F; Steinhoff HJ
    HNO; 1988 Dec; 36(12):511-5. PubMed ID: 3235366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between auditory brain stem responses evoked by rarefaction and condensation step functions and clicks.
    Tietze G; Pantev C
    Audiology; 1986; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 3954683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing of spike initiation in cochlear afferents: dependence on site of innervation.
    Ruggero MA; Rich NC
    J Neurophysiol; 1987 Aug; 58(2):379-403. PubMed ID: 3655874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wiener kernels of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers: verification using responses to tones, clicks, and noise and comparison with basilar-membrane vibrations.
    Temchin AN; Recio-Spinoso A; van Dijk P; Ruggero MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 93(6):3635-48. PubMed ID: 15659530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The combined effects of forward masking by noise and high click rate on monaural and binaural human auditory nerve and brainstem potentials.
    Pratt H; Polyakov A; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Hear Res; 2004 Jul; 193(1-2):83-94. PubMed ID: 15219323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear potentials and auditory evoked potentials in the caiman (Caiman crocodilus (L.)).
    Smolders JW; Caird DM; Klinke R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 Feb; 75(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 1688779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural organization in the brainstem circuit mediating the primary acoustic head startle: an electrophysiological study in the rat.
    Pellet J
    Physiol Behav; 1990 Nov; 48(5):727-39. PubMed ID: 2082373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2514-25. PubMed ID: 2745876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear microphonic responses to acoustic clicks in guinea pig and their relation with microphonic responses to pure tones.
    Echeverría EL; Robles LW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 6841799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compound action potential and cochlear microphonic extracted from electrocochleographic responses to condensation or rarefaction clicks.
    Arslan E; Santarelli R; Sparacino G; Sella G
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 120(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11603770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Correlation of the latency shift and brain stem potentials in basocochlear hearing loss and the time course of the click stimulus-induced evoked wave in the cochlea].
    Janssen T; Steinhoff HJ; Böhnke F
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Jul; 68(7):379-82. PubMed ID: 2765050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of stimulus rise-time and polarity on the auditory brainstem responses.
    Salt AN; Thornton AR
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 6463551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrically evoked potentials in cochlear implant subjects.
    Miyamoto RT
    Laryngoscope; 1986 Feb; 96(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 3753737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion.
    Dau T; Wegner O; Mellert V; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1530-40. PubMed ID: 10738807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain stem auditory evoked response development in the kitten.
    Shipley C; Buchwald JS; Norman R; Guthrie D
    Brain Res; 1980 Jan; 182(2):313-26. PubMed ID: 7357388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brainstem evoked responses to paired-click stimuli: the use of digital response subtraction.
    Burkard R; Deegan D
    Audiology; 1984; 23(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 6704062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.