These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4061074)

  • 21. Long-term results for the Xomed Audiant Bone Conductor.
    Hough JV; Hough DA; McGee M
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 7739868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Changes in the auditory threshold for air and bone conduction in relation to middle ear pressure in probands with normal hearing].
    Maier W; Ross UH
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep; 74(9):525-30. PubMed ID: 7495432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The pure-tone hearing thresholds of otologically healthy 14-year-old children.
    Rahko-Laitila P; Karma P; Laippala P; Salmelin R; Sipilä M; Manninen M; Rahko T
    Audiology; 2001; 40(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 11521708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
    Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High-frequency air-conduction and electric bone-conduction audiometry. Age and sex variations.
    Löppönen H; Sorri M; Bloigu R
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 1842287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The super-bass bone-anchored hearing aid compared to conventional hearing aids. Audiological results and the patients' opinions.
    Snik AF; Jorritsma FF; Cremers CW; Beynon AJ; van den Berge NW
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 1439502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Casey KA; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 24569693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of the benefit of bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Browning GG; Gatehouse S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1994 Nov; 103(11):872-8. PubMed ID: 7979001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
    Mojallal H; Schwab B; Hinze AL; Giere T; Lenarz T
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Bone conduction hearing aids with fluid medium].
    Siegert R; Rohweder R; Witte J; Weerda H
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):244-8. PubMed ID: 9324865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of Implantable Hearing Aids and Bone Conduction Implant System in patients with bilateral congenital deformation of the external and middle ear.
    Lin J; Chen S; Zhang H; Xiong H; Zhang Z; Liang M; Zhang X; Ye H; Zheng Y
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Apr; 119():89-95. PubMed ID: 30690308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fully implantable hearing aids in patients with congenital auricular atresia.
    Siegert R; Mattheis S; Kasic J
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Feb; 117(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 17277630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant.
    Riss D; Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Blineder M; Flak S; Bachner A; Gstoettner W; Hamzavi JS
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Dec; 124(12):2802-6. PubMed ID: 25142577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bone conduction implants: transcutaneous vs. percutaneous.
    Wade PS; Halik JJ; Chasin M
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1992 Jan; 106(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 1734371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hearing aid validation based on 40 Hz auditory steady-state response thresholds.
    Sardari S; Jafari Z; Haghani H; Talebi H
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):134-41. PubMed ID: 26385486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Percutaneous titanium implantation in the skull for the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Mylanus EA; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    J Invest Surg; 1994; 7(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 7803343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Repeatability of high-frequency bone conduction thresholds.
    Frank T; Ragland AE
    Ear Hear; 1987 Dec; 8(6):343-6. PubMed ID: 3322900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The bone conduction implant: Clinical results of the first six patients.
    Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Taghavi H; Fredén Jansson KJ; Eeg-Olofsson M
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 25705995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.