These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4061604)

  • 21. An assessment of sex using the skull of black South Africans by discriminant function analysis.
    Dayal MR; Spocter MA; Bidmos MA
    Homo; 2008; 59(3):209-21. PubMed ID: 18439606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sexual dimorphism in the pelvic bones of the Tellem, a medieval Negro population from the Mali Republic.
    Glanville EV
    Proc K Ned Akad Wet C; 1967; 70(3):368-77. PubMed ID: 4227061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variation in pelvic size between males and females.
    Tague RG
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1989 Sep; 80(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 2801906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The reliability of sex determination of skeletons from forensic context in the Balkans.
    Durić M; Rakocević Z; Donić D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):159-64. PubMed ID: 15567621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A pilot study on assessment of racial affinity of Sri Lankan population using discriminant function statistics and a few established morphological racial traits.
    Perera P; Pathmeswaran A
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2009 Apr; 11 Suppl 1():S182-5. PubMed ID: 19261526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sexual dimorphism in skeletal browridge and chin morphologies determined using a new quantitative method.
    Garvin HM; Ruff CB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2012 Apr; 147(4):661-70. PubMed ID: 22371071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discriminant function analysis for sex assessment in pelvic girdle bones: sample from the contemporary Mexican population.
    Gómez-Valdés JA; Torres Ramírez G; Báez Molgado S; Herrera Sain-Leu P; Castrejón Caballero JL; Sánchez-Mejorada G
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Mar; 56(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 21265837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Evaluation of the sexing methods using the cranial traits in the Japanese population].
    Sakaue K; Adachi N
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 2009 Nov; 63(2):125-40. PubMed ID: 20055190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Morphometric Outline Analysis of Ancestry and Sex Differences in Cranial Shape.
    Murphy RE; Garvin HM
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1001-1009. PubMed ID: 29193064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The utility of elliptical Fourier analysis for estimating ancestry and sex from lateral skull photographs.
    Caple JM; Byrd JE; Stephan CN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():352-362. PubMed ID: 29957511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of metric sex analysis of skeletal remains using Fordisc based on a recent skull collection.
    Ramsthaler F; Kreutz K; Verhoff MA
    Int J Legal Med; 2007 Nov; 121(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 17899153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sex estimation from dimensions of the base of the skull in Black South Africans.
    Dayal MR; Billings BK; Brits D; Abdallah A; Spocter MA; Bidmos MA
    Anthropol Anz; 2022 Aug; 79(4):411-421. PubMed ID: 35191461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sexing North American Eskimo and Indian innominate bones with the acetabulum/pubis index.
    Schulter-Ellis FP; Hayek LA
    J Forensic Sci; 1988 May; 33(3):697-708. PubMed ID: 3385380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Approaches to the study of developmental variability in human skeletal populations.
    Johnston FE
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1969 Nov; 31(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 4313258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Classification and misclassification in sexing the Black femur by discriminant function analysis.
    Dibennardo R; Taylor JV
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1982 Jun; 58(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 7114200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pelvimetry of Chinese females with special reference to pelvic type and maternal height.
    Chen HY; Chen YP; Lee LS; Huang SC
    Int Surg; 1982; 67(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7096006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of discriminant functions for sexing skulls from visually assessed traits applied in the Rainer Osteological Collection (Bucharest, Romania).
    Soficaru A; Constantinescu M; Culea M; Ionică C
    Homo; 2014 Dec; 65(6):464-75. PubMed ID: 25457446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determination of sex from arm bone measurements.
    Holman DJ; Bennett KA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Apr; 84(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 2053616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating macroscopic sex estimation methods using genetically sexed archaeological material: The medieval skeletal collection from St John's Divinity School, Cambridge.
    Inskip S; Scheib CL; Wohns AW; Ge X; Kivisild T; Robb J
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Feb; 168(2):340-351. PubMed ID: 30575013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An examination of the meaning of cranial discrete traits for human skeletal biological studies.
    Corruccini RS
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1974 May; 40(3):425-45. PubMed ID: 4826459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.