These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4062630)

  • 1. Oh, the times! Tabloids and other non-peer-reviewed publications.
    Finkelstein D
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1985 Nov; 103(11):1641-2. PubMed ID: 4062630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exclusionary editorial policy of peer-reviewed publications and the accuracy of news tabloids.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Aug; 104(8):1111-2. PubMed ID: 3741218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predatory Journals: When Publications Fall Prey.
    Kirkham EN; Paul SP
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 Apr; 28(4):335-336. PubMed ID: 29615185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The intent of peer-reviewed journals.
    Friedman SG
    Am J Surg; 1992 Jun; 163(6):633-5. PubMed ID: 1595844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The editorial process for medical journals: I. Introduction of a series and discussion of the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers.
    Liesegang TJ; Albert DM; Schachat AP; Minckler DS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 12834678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality filters in medical publications.
    Balasubramanian S; Bhaskar PA
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1984 Nov; 82(11):420-1. PubMed ID: 6399064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publications].
    Manschot WA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Jan; 139(2):98. PubMed ID: 7838231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review.
    Nature; 1989 Sep; 341(6240):275. PubMed ID: 2797137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does editorial peer review work?
    Lock S
    Ann Intern Med; 1994 Jul; 121(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 8198351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
    Frey JJ
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review--the only answer to high-quality research?
    Abdellah FG
    J Prof Nurs; 1990; 6(2):70. PubMed ID: 2362049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making the most of peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 3(7):629. PubMed ID: 10862686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Affirming science and peer-review publishing.
    Talley CR
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 May; 66(10):896. PubMed ID: 19420307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
    Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Art of Peer Review.
    Fraser D
    Neonatal Netw; 2018 Jul; 37(4):195-196. PubMed ID: 30567915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Peer review: is one-eye king?].
    de Jong BC; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jan; 137(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8419837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perfecting peer review?
    Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.