These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4062761)

  • 1. Iodamide meglumine as a contrast medium for intravenous urography.
    Hare WS; Klempfner G; Lee EW
    Australas Radiol; 1985 May; 29(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 4062761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Double-blind comparison of meglumine iodamide and Renografin-60 for excretory urography.
    Gerzof SG; Robbins AH; Unger G; Zaki A; Wickis EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Feb; 128(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 401604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double-blind comparison of iodamide and diatrizoate for excretory urography.
    Rosenfield AT; Putman CE; Ulreich S; Koss N
    Yale J Biol Med; 1977; 50(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 345632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative radiological studies of Uromiro and Urografin as contrast media for excretion urography.
    Adamali N; Raja R
    East Afr Med J; 1979 Nov; 56(11):593-6. PubMed ID: 520238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of the methylglucamine salts of iodamide and iothalamate in clinical urography.
    Owen JP; Keir MJ; Nair KV; Lauckner D; Wilsdon JB
    Clin Radiol; 1981 May; 32(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 7237916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Drip infusion urography with meglumine iodamide.
    Robbins AH; Rosenfield AT; Pizzolato NF; Irwin GA; Putman CE; Gerzof SG; Ulreich S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Dec; 131(6):1043-6. PubMed ID: 104570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between two hysterosalpingographic contrast media--Urografin 370 and Isteropac.
    Whitehouse GH; Sausman C
    Br J Radiol; 1981 May; 54(641):429-30. PubMed ID: 7237019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast-medium-induced electrocardiographic abnormalities: comparison of bolus and infusion of methylglucamine iodamide and methylglucamine/sodium diatrizoate.
    Pfister RC; Hutter AM; Newhouse JH; Yoder IC; Travers E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Jan; 140(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 6600306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between iodamide and iothalamate in intravenous urography.
    Dubbins PA; Marshall W; O'Riordan D; O'Neill G; Ruffell E; Laws JW
    Clin Radiol; 1981 Nov; 32(6):677-8. PubMed ID: 7307439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The old and the new: a study of five contrast media for urography.
    Davies P; Panto PN; Buckley J; Richardson RE
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jul; 58(691):593-7. PubMed ID: 3893610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value of high contrast medium dose in brain CT.
    Raininko R; Majurin ML; Virtama P; Kangasniemi P
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1982 Feb; 6(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 7069012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Urography. Physiological considerations on the excretion of contrast media.
    Golman K
    J Belge Radiol; 1977; 60(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 338573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Renal handling of iodamide and diatrizoate. Evidence of active tubular secretion of iodamide.
    Bollerup AC; Hesse B; Steiness E
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1975 Oct; 9(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 1233254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
    Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Urography with low-osmolality contrast media: comparative urinary excretion of Iopamidol, Hexabrix, and diatrizoate.
    Spataro RF; Fischer HW; Boylan L
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(5):494-500. PubMed ID: 7141831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High- and low-osmolar contrast agents in urography: a comparison of the appearances with respect to pyelotubular opacification and renal length.
    Whitehouse RW
    Clin Radiol; 1986 Jul; 37(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 3731706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative multiclinical studies of iodamide and diatrizoate in excretory urography.
    de Langen JE; Hermans J
    Radiology; 1973 Jan; 106(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 4566357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Urography with iohexol. Comparison with metrizoate and iodamide.
    Edgren J; Kivisaari A; Laasonen L; Standertskiƶld-Nordenstam CG
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():46-9. PubMed ID: 6382934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Use of a new water-soluble contrast medium, iodamide 300, in urography and cerebral angiography].
    Corsi M; Tassini T
    Quad Radiol; 1969; 34(3):187-206. PubMed ID: 5362794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.