These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4063650)

  • 1. Detection of small focal lesions in CT images: effects of reconstruction filters and visual display windows.
    Judy PF; Swensson RG
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Feb; 58(686):137-45. PubMed ID: 4063650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Display thresholding of images and observer detection performance.
    Judy PF; Swensson RG
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1987 May; 4(5):954-65. PubMed ID: 3598747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lesion detection and signal-to-noise ratio in CT images.
    Judy PF; Swensson RG; Szulc M
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 7207423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics and control of contrast in CT.
    Barnes JE
    Radiographics; 1992 Jul; 12(4):825-37. PubMed ID: 1636042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom.
    Paul J; Krauss B; Banckwitz R; Maentele W; Bauer RW; Vogl TJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):e699-703. PubMed ID: 21316888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection and characterization of lesions on low-radiation-dose abdominal CT images postprocessed with noise reduction filters.
    Kalra MK; Maher MM; Blake MA; Lucey BC; Karau K; Toth TL; Avinash G; Halpern EF; Saini S
    Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):791-7. PubMed ID: 15333797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of the influence of image reconstruction filter and scan parameters on operation of automatic tube current modulation systems for different CT scanners.
    Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Mar; 163(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 25107439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial domain filtering for fast modification of the tradeoff between image sharpness and pixel noise in computed tomography.
    Schaller S; Wildberger JE; Raupach R; Niethammer M; Klingenbeck-Regn K; Flohr T
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 22(7):846-53. PubMed ID: 12906238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
    Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
    Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Size discrimination in computed tomographic images. Effects of feature contrast and display window.
    Seltzer SE; Swensson RG; Judy PF; Nawfel RD
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Jun; 23(6):455-62. PubMed ID: 3403205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The removal of a "cupping" artefact from brain images produced by the EMI 7070 CT scanner.
    Mott DJ; Zheng GL; Eddleston B
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Sep; 58(693):873-80. PubMed ID: 3916065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol.
    Klink T; Obmann V; Heverhagen J; Stork A; Adam G; Begemann P
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 83(9):1645-54. PubMed ID: 25037931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of CT noise on detectability of test objects.
    Chew E; Weiss GH; Brooks RA; Di Chiro G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Oct; 131(4):681-5. PubMed ID: 102161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A survey of 29 EMI CT machines in Britain.
    Speller RD; White DR; Veerappan R; Coleman AJ; Waller PE
    Br J Radiol; 1981 Mar; 54(639):232-40. PubMed ID: 7470785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. To bin or not to bin? The effect of CT system limiting resolution on noise and detectability.
    Baek J; Pineda AR; Pelc NJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Mar; 58(5):1433-46. PubMed ID: 23399724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image techniques for multiplanar computed tomography.
    Johnson GA; Korobkin M
    Radiology; 1982 Sep; 144(4):829-34. PubMed ID: 7111733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media.
    Grant KL; Flohr TG; Krauss B; Sedlmair M; Thomas C; Schmidt B
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Sep; 49(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 24710203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can noise reduction filters improve low-radiation-dose chest CT images? Pilot study.
    Kalra MK; Wittram C; Maher MM; Sharma A; Avinash GB; Karau K; Toth TL; Halpern E; Saini S; Shepard JA
    Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):257-64. PubMed ID: 12750460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detectability in computed tomographic images.
    Hanson KM
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 492079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wavelet based noise reduction in CT-images using correlation analysis.
    Borsdorf A; Raupach R; Flohr T; Hornegger J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Dec; 27(12):1685-703. PubMed ID: 19033085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.