These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4064651)

  • 21. "Reactions" to standard patch test materials.
    Kligman AM; Leyden JJ
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1979; 59(85):101-3. PubMed ID: 294084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The relevance of chlorhexidine contact allergy.
    Liippo J; Kousa P; Lammintausta K
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Apr; 64(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 21226717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contact dermatitis in patients with leg ulcers. The prevalence of late positive reactions and evidence against systemic ampliative allergy.
    Paramsothy Y; Collins M; Smith AG
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Jan; 18(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 3349776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A clinical and patch test study in a tall-oil rosin factory.
    Färm G; Lidén C; Karlberg AT
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Aug; 31(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 7750248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigation of suspected contact sensitivity to tobacco in cigarette and cigar factory employees.
    Rycroft RJ; Smith NP; Stok ET; Middleton K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Jan; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 6454533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contact dermatitis from a compound mixture of sugar and povidone-iodine.
    Kudo H; Takahashi K; Suzuki Y; Tanaka T; Miyachi Y; Imamura S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Mar; 18(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 3365968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Contact allergy reactions in 100 selected patients with a leg ulcer].
    Malten KE; Kuiper JP
    Phlebologie; 1985; 38(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 4059335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Allergic contact dermatitis in venous leg ulcer patients.
    Tavadia S; Bianchi J; Dawe RS; McEvoy M; Wiggins E; Hamill E; Urcelay M; Strong AM; Douglas WS
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 May; 48(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 12868967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Delayed and immediate-type hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine.
    Bergqvist-Karlsson A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Feb; 18(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 3365965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pilot trial to compare tolerance of chlorhexidine gluconate to povidone-iodine antisepsis for central venous catheter placement in neonates.
    Garland JS; Alex CP; Uhing MR; Peterside IE; Rentz A; Harris MC
    J Perinatol; 2009 Dec; 29(12):808-13. PubMed ID: 19812587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic procedures for eczema patients.
    Veien NK; Hattel T; Justesen O; Nørholm A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Jul; 17(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 2958211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hand eczema: causes, course, and prognosis I.
    Veien NK; Hattel T; Laurberg G
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jun; 58(6):330-4. PubMed ID: 18503681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Allergic contact dermatitis from chlorhexidine diacetate in a skin swab.
    Reynolds NJ; Harman RR
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Feb; 22(2):103-4. PubMed ID: 2138963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patch test sensitivity to Kathon CG.
    Hjorth N; Roed-Petersen J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Mar; 14(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 3709160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. False-positive, follicular and irritant patch test reactions to metal salts.
    Fischer T; Rystedt I
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Feb; 12(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 3157537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Local reactions to a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated antimicrobial dressing in very low birth weight infants.
    Garland JS; Alex CP; Mueller CD; Cisler-Kahill LA
    Pediatr Infect Dis J; 1996 Oct; 15(10):912-4. PubMed ID: 8895928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patch testing in children. (I) Collective test results; skin testability in children.
    Pevny I; Brennenstuhl M; Razinskas G
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Oct; 11(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 6499421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contact dermatitis from chlorhexidine.
    Shoji A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1983 Mar; 9(2):156. PubMed ID: 6851529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Citral a fragrance allergen and irritant.
    Heydorn S; Menné T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; White IR; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jul; 49(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 14641118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.