148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4065856)
21. Legislating social control of the mentally ill in California.
Lamb HR; Sorkin AP; Zusman J
Am J Psychiatry; 1981 Mar; 138(3):334-9. PubMed ID: 7468829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The American Psychiatric Association's proposals on civil commitment.
Rubenstein LS
Clgh Rev; 1983 Oct; 17(5):558-62. PubMed ID: 11658653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A review of tort liability in involuntary civil commitment.
Knapp S; VandeCreek L
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1987 Jun; 38(6):648-51. PubMed ID: 3596501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Compulsory medical psychiatric hospitalization: a critical review of the Israeli law and a proposal for changes.
Ginath Y; Bar-El Y
Med Law; 1985; 4(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 4010489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Involuntary detention and treatment of the mentally ill: China's 2012 Mental Health Law.
Ding C
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(6):581-8. PubMed ID: 24630738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. States move to ease law committing mentally ill.
Goleman D
N Y Times Web; 1986 Dec; ():C1, C4. PubMed ID: 11647825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Detention--law or colours of law?].
Krzymiński S
Psychiatr Pol; 2010; 44(2):287-8. PubMed ID: 20677447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Legal rights of mental patients.
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1979 Mar; 53(5):49-52, 92. PubMed ID: 759339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Mental health law reform: advance towards enlightenment or denial of reality?
Doutney C
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1986 Sep; 20(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 3467707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Psychiatrists' opinions about involuntary civil commitment: results of a national survey.
Brooks RA
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 17592168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Detention--means of protection in psychiatry, law and reality].
Ciszewski L; Heitzman J
Psychiatr Pol; 2010; 44(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 20919510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Continuing case law development in the right to refuse treatment.
Mills MJ; Yesavage JA; Gutheil TG
Am J Psychiatry; 1983 Jun; 140(6):715-9. PubMed ID: 6846630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of broadened civil commitment standards on admissions to state mental hospitals.
Pierce GL; Durham ML; Fisher WH
Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 142(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 3966567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Psychiatric DRGs: the legal and ethical impact.
Morgenlander KH; Greenwald DE
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1985 Jun; 11(6):175-9. PubMed ID: 3939597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The Council on Governmental Policy and Law.
Stone AA
Am J Psychiatry; 1982 Mar; 139(3):390-1. PubMed ID: 11643714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Civil commitment: a review of traditional arrangements in the provision of involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill.
Strong HR
Can J Psychiatry; 1983 Jun; 28(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 6871819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The obviously ill patient in need of treatment: a fourth standard for civil commitment.
Treffert DA
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 36(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 3979975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The diverse goals involved in treatment of the mentally ill. Is a collision inevitable?
Daly JL
J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):49-89. PubMed ID: 3495624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Screening services in civil commitment of the mentally ill: an attempt to balance individual liberties with needs for treatment.
Aviram U
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 8364237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law.
Gutheil TG; Mills MJ
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
