191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4065858)
1. Implications of need-for-treatment laws: a study of Washington State's Involuntary Treatment Act.
Durham ML
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Sep; 36(9):975-7. PubMed ID: 4065858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Need-for-treatment criteria for involuntary civil commitment: impact in practice.
Miller RD
Am J Psychiatry; 1992 Oct; 149(10):1380-4. PubMed ID: 1341418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal intervention in civil commitment: the impact of broadened commitment criteria.
Durham ML; Pierce GL
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci; 1986 Mar; (484):42-55. PubMed ID: 10276574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of broadened civil commitment standards on admissions to state mental hospitals.
Pierce GL; Durham ML; Fisher WH
Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 142(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 3966567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of public policy and publicity on admissions to state mental health hospitals.
Pierce GL; Durham ML; Fisher WH
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(1):41-66. PubMed ID: 3722785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Involuntary community treatment of people who are violent and mentally ill: a legal analysis.
Slobogin C
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1994 Jul; 45(7):685-9. PubMed ID: 7927293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The obviously ill patient in need of treatment: a fourth standard for civil commitment.
Treffert DA
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 36(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 3979975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The imminent peril in the law of July the fifth 2011, two years later: the impact on health?].
Mondoloni A; Buard M; Nargeot J; Vacheron MN
Encephale; 2014 Dec; 40(6):468-73. PubMed ID: 24703930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The test of compulsion in mental health law: capacity, therapeutic benefit and dangerousness as possible criteria.
Bartlett P
Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(3):326-52. PubMed ID: 16733878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Civil commitment of mentally ill patients: developments in Flanders].
Nys H; Vandenberghe J
Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2008; 50 Spec no.():55-60. PubMed ID: 19067301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do dangerousness-oriented commitment laws restrict hospitalization of patients who need treatment? A test.
Cleveland S; Mulvey EP; Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1989 Mar; 40(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 2917736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of broadened civil commitment laws on length of stay in a state mental hospital.
Pierce GL; Fisher WH; Durham ML
Law Med Health Care; 1985 Dec; 13(6):290-6. PubMed ID: 3854894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Donaldson revisited: is dangerousness a constitutional requirement for civil commitment?
Linburn GE
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9785278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening services in civil commitment of the mentally ill: an attempt to balance individual liberties with needs for treatment.
Aviram U
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 8364237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. After Hendricks: defining constitutional treatment for Washington State's Civil commitment program.
Lieb R
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():474-88. PubMed ID: 12839920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The paradoxical increase in involuntary admissions after the revision of the Civil Commitment Law in Belgium.
Lecompte D
Med Law; 1995; 14(1-2):53-7. PubMed ID: 7666748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Legislating social control of the mentally ill in California.
Lamb HR; Sorkin AP; Zusman J
Am J Psychiatry; 1981 Mar; 138(3):334-9. PubMed ID: 7468829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A ten-year study of civil commitments in Washington State.
Hasebe T; McRae J
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1987 Sep; 38(9):983-7. PubMed ID: 3679105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Beyond deinstitutionalization: a commitment law in evolution.
Durham ML; Pierce GL
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Mar; 33(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 7061058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An empirical comparison of the stone and dangerousness criteria for civil commitment.
Hoge SK; Appelbaum PS; Greer A
Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Feb; 146(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 2912258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
