139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4065859)
21. Commitment: the consistency of clinicians and the use of legal standards.
Lidz CW; Mulvey EP; Appelbaum PS; Cleveland S
Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Feb; 146(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 2912259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Council on Psychiatry and Law.
Roth LH
Am J Psychiatry; 1986 Mar; 143(3):412-3. PubMed ID: 11643912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Civil commitment in Turkey: reflections on a bill drafted by psychiatrists.
Arikan R; Appelbaum PS; Sercan M; Turkcan S; Satmis N; Polat A
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 16844221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. More positive supreme court views on psychiatry.
Kennelly DJ
Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 142(3):387-8. PubMed ID: 3970284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. When treatment becomes coercion: a legal perspective.
Einhorn AH
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1980; 347():199-208. PubMed ID: 6930899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The right to treatment and involuntary commitment.
Carroll MA
J Med Philos; 1980 Dec; 5(4):278-91. PubMed ID: 7205095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Legal issues in emergency psychiatry.
Fauman BJ
Emerg Health Serv Rev; 1985 Winter-1986 Spring; 3(2-3):75-86. PubMed ID: 10280078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The law and the mentally incompetent.
Leahy ML; Barnes M
Public Welf; 1978; 36(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 10294858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Decade of litigation has led to redefinition of patients' rights.
Weiner BA
Hospitals; 1981 May; 55(9):67-70. PubMed ID: 7216209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An empirical comparison of the stone and dangerousness criteria for civil commitment.
Hoge SK; Appelbaum PS; Greer A
Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Feb; 146(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 2912258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An essay on commitment and the emergency room: implications for the delivery of mental health services.
Churgin MJ
Law Med Health Care; 1985 Dec; 13(6):297-303. PubMed ID: 3854895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Dangerousness and commitment of the mentally disordered in the United States.
Monahan J; Shah SA
Schizophr Bull; 1989; 15(4):541-53. PubMed ID: 2696085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The dilemma of civil rights versus the right to treatment: questionable involuntary admissions to a mental hospital.
Isohanni M; Nieminen P; Moring J; Pylkkänen K; Spalding M
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1991 Apr; 83(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 2028801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Involuntary detention and treatment of the mentally ill: China's 2012 Mental Health Law.
Ding C
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(6):581-8. PubMed ID: 24630738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patients' rights: a cultural challenge to Western psychiatry.
Brody EB
Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 142(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 2981484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The right to refuse psychiatric treatment.
Wettstein RM
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 22(1):173-82, viii. PubMed ID: 10083953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The right to refuse treatment with antipsychotic medications: retrospect and prospect.
Appelbaum PS
Am J Psychiatry; 1988 Apr; 145(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 3279829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The APA model law and three legal issues in mental health.
Korr WS
Health Soc Work; 1987; 12(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 3679013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Legislation concerning patients' rights in Israel and in Britain.
Levy A; Davidson S
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1986; 23(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 3804693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Screening services in civil commitment of the mentally ill: an attempt to balance individual liberties with needs for treatment.
Aviram U
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 8364237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
