These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4066245)

  • 1. Effects of intravenous administration of a new nonionic dimeric contrast medium on the coronary circulation. Comparison with monomeric ionic and nonionic media.
    Lanzer P; Dean PB; Lipton MJ; Sievers R; Botvinick E; Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Oct; 20(7):746-50. PubMed ID: 4066245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemodynamic effects of contrast media during coronary angiography: a comparison of three nonionic agents to Hypaque-76.
    Piao ZE; Murdock DK; Hwang MH; Raymond RM; Scanlon PJ
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988; 14(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 3349517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects.
    Higgins CB; Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Shaw D
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Results of a multicenter trial.
    Bettmann MA; Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S70-4. PubMed ID: 3882619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate in cerebral angiography.
    Kido DK; Morris TW; Ekholm S; Plassche W; Erickson JL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():142-6. PubMed ID: 6591738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of intravenous administration of ionic and nonionic contrast materials. Implications for deriving physiologic measurements from computed tomography and digital cardiovascular imaging.
    Higgins CB; Gerber KH; Mattrey RF; Slutsky RA
    Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 7063684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of a new arthrographic contrast agent: Iotrol.
    Guerra J; Resnick D; Haghighi P; Sovak M; Cone R
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 6469527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporomandibular joint arthrography: comparison of morbidity with ionic and low osmolality contrast media.
    Katzberg RW; Miller TL; Hayakawa K; Manzione JV; Tallents RH
    Radiology; 1985 Apr; 155(1):245-6. PubMed ID: 3883421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effects of water soluble iodinated contrast media on microcirculation in the rat mesenterium and liver].
    Kanazawa M
    Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi; 1984 Oct; 51(5):590-600. PubMed ID: 6501555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiotolerance of iohexol. Survey of experimental evidence.
    Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S65-9. PubMed ID: 3882618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media versus iohexol.
    Wolf GL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():166-70. PubMed ID: 6382932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Acute cardiac side effects of iodecol, a new nonionic dimer roentgen contrast medium, in intracoronary injection].
    Schräder R; Hoeft A; Hoeft T; Korb H; Wolpers HG; Kober G; Hellige G
    Z Kardiol; 1985 Oct; 74(10):604-10. PubMed ID: 4072332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig.
    Jensen LI; Golman K; Nyman U; Dean PB
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 4077451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Kieffer SA
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():81-4. PubMed ID: 6382939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative effects of ionic anc nonionic contrast materials on coronary and peripheral blood flow.
    Gerber KH; Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 7118518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined actions of verapamil and contrast media on atrioventricular conduction. Influence of osmolality of the media.
    Peck WW; Slutsky RA; Mancini GB; Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 6469525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The haemodynamic effects of left ventriculography in coronary artery disease and mitral valve disease: a comparison of high and low osmolality contrast media.
    Fraser AG; Culling W; Singh H; Ruttley MS; Newcombe RG
    Eur Heart J; 1984 Sep; 5(9):727-34. PubMed ID: 6389137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent.
    Bettmann MA; Bourdillon PD; Barry WH; Brush KA; Levin DC
    Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):583-7. PubMed ID: 6387783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Coronary arteriography with a plasma-isotonic roentgen contrast medium: effects on ECG, blood pressure and coronary circulation].
    Schräder R; Abel J; Sievert H; Friedmann A; Kaltenbach M; Kober G
    Z Kardiol; 1989 Jan; 78(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 2646839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.