206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4066421)
1. [What average hearing gains can be expected at present with children wearing hearing aids?].
Kruse E
HNO; 1985 Oct; 33(10):463-7. PubMed ID: 4066421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aided and unaided narrow band noise thresholds in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment.
Garstecki DC; Bode DL
J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):258-62. PubMed ID: 931761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of audiometric configuration on pure-tone, warble-tone and narrow-band noise thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing losses.
Stephens MM; Rintelmann WF
J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 659294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of pure-tone, warble-tone and narrow-band noise thresholds of young normal-hearing children.
Orchik DJ; Rintelmann WF
J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):214-20. PubMed ID: 659293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term audiometric follow-up of click-evoked auditory brainstem response in hearing-impaired infants.
Schoonhoven R; Lamoré PJ; de Laat JA; Grote JJ
Audiology; 2000; 39(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 10905399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
Scollie SD
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Audiometric manifestations of Waardenburg's syndrome.
Oysu C; Baserer N; Tinaz M
Ear Nose Throat J; 2000 Sep; 79(9):704-9. PubMed ID: 11011489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aided auditory steady-state responses in infants.
Stroebel D; Swanepoel de W; Groenewald E
Int J Audiol; 2007 Jun; 46(6):287-92. PubMed ID: 17530513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Use of computerized audiometry for assessing the effectiveness of hearing aids in children].
Sagalovich BM; Melkumova GG
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1982; (3):17-20. PubMed ID: 7048695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Low-frequency sensorineural loss: clinical evaluation and implications for hearing aid fitting.
Halpin C; Thornton A; Hasso M
Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 8194681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hearing assessment in pre-school children with speech delay.
Psillas G; Psifidis A; Antoniadou-Hitoglou M; Kouloulas A
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Sep; 33(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 16420975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hearing aids and cochlear damage: the case against fitting the pure tone audiogram.
Halpin C; Rauch SD
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 May; 140(5):629-32. PubMed ID: 19393401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Behavioral audiometry: validity of audiometric measurements obtained using the "Delaroche protocol" in babies aged 4--18 months suffering from bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
Delaroche M; Thiébaut R; Dauman R
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):993-1002. PubMed ID: 16324753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electroacoustic evaluation of frequency-modulated receivers interfaced with personal hearing aids.
Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM; Whalen HS; Overson GJ
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Oct; 38(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 17890512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
