BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4066521)

  • 1. Role of suppressive interactions in the cochlear microphonic response to wide-band clicks.
    Legouix JP; Avan P
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 4066521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear microphonic responses to acoustic clicks in guinea pig and their relation with microphonic responses to pure tones.
    Echeverría EL; Robles LW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 6841799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The origin of the low-frequency microphonic in the first cochlear turn of guinea-pig.
    Patuzzi RB; Yates GK; Johnstone BM
    Hear Res; 1989 May; 39(1-2):177-88. PubMed ID: 2737964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The spectral content of the cochlear microphonic measured in scala media of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Hubbard AE; Mountain DC; Geisler CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):415-30. PubMed ID: 512203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of sectioning auditory centrifugal fibers on the cochlear microphonic and action potential in guinea pigs.
    Talbott RE; Barry J; Barry SJ
    J Aud Res; 1978 Oct; 18(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 756871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations of cochlear microphonic potential after sectioning efferent fibers to the cochlea.
    Bonfils P; Remond MC; Pujol R
    Hear Res; 1987; 30(2-3):267-71. PubMed ID: 3680069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voltage-dependent elements are involved in the generation of the cochlear microphonic and the sound-induced resistance changes measured in scala media of the guinea pig.
    Mountain DC; Hubbard AE; Geisler CD
    Hear Res; 1980 Oct; 3(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 7440425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig.
    Stronks HC; Versnel H; Prijs VF; Klis SF
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19840841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological responses in guinea pig cochlea to low frequency sound stimuli: distortion of cochlear microphonic (CM) wave form.
    Maehara N; Sadamoto T; Yamamura K
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1983; 51(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 6684037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of compound action potential and cochlear microphonic two-tone suppression in the guinea pig.
    Remond MC; Harrison RV; Legouix JP
    Hear Res; 1982 Sep; 8(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 7142036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relation of receptor potentials of cochlear hair cells to spike discharges of cochlear neurons.
    Weiss TF
    Annu Rev Physiol; 1984; 46():247-59. PubMed ID: 6370108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulation of efferents alters the cochlear microphonic and the sound-induced resistance changes measured in scale media of the guinea pig.
    Mountain DC; Geisler CD; Hubbard AE
    Hear Res; 1980 Oct; 3(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 7440426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relations between cochlear injuries and CM potentials.
    Wagner H; Berndt H
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979; (9):119-27. PubMed ID: 294675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Relationship between cochlear fatigue and the asymmetrical non-linearity of microphonic responses in the guinea pig (author's transl)].
    Legouix JP; Pierson A; Minot JF
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1979 Dec; 96(12):821-6. PubMed ID: 533088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-tone interactions in the cochlear microphonic.
    Cheatham MA; Dallos P
    Hear Res; 1982 Sep; 8(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 7142031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comments on the effects of overstimulation on microphonic sensitivity.
    Durrant JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):597-8. PubMed ID: 512210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modifications of the nonlinearity of the cochlear microphonic responses produced by noise exposure in the guinea pig.
    Legouix JP; Joannès M
    Hear Res; 1984 Apr; 14(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 6746420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variability in the depression of cochlear microphonic responses after noise exposure.
    Legouix JP; Joannes M; Saulnier C
    Audiology; 1985; 24(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 4004649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a concha electrode to measure response patterns based on the amplitudes of cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal-hearing subjects.
    Zhang M
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 25083598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast enhancement in frequency spectra of cochlear microphonic responses to complex stimuli.
    Wit HP; Horst JW
    Hear Res; 1986; 21(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 3957796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.