These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Momentary time sampling as an estimate of percentage time: A field validation. Saudargas RA; Zanolli K J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(4):533-7. PubMed ID: 16795737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The representativeness of observational samples of different durations. Mudford OC; Beale IL; Singh NN J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 2249968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Procedures and Accuracy of Discontinuous Measurement of Problem Behavior in Common Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis. LeBlanc LA; Lund C; Kooken C; Lund JB; Fisher WW Behav Anal Pract; 2020 Jun; 13(2):411-420. PubMed ID: 32642397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimizing and Reporting Momentary Time-Sampling Measurement Error in Single-Case Research. Cook KB; Snyder SM Behav Anal Pract; 2020 Mar; 13(1):247-252. PubMed ID: 32231987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Representativeness of direct observations selected using a work-sampling equation. Sharp RA; Mudford OC; Elliffe D J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):153-66. PubMed ID: 25754895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Taking a closer look: time sampling and measurement error. Powell J; Martindale B; Kulp S; Martindale A; Bauman R J Appl Behav Anal; 1977; 10(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 16795556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical note: Comparison of instantaneous sampling and continuous observation of dairy cattle behavior in freestall housing. Chen JM; Schütz KE; Tucker CB J Dairy Sci; 2016 Oct; 99(10):8341-8346. PubMed ID: 27474985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating optimal observational sampling frequency of behaviors for cattle fed high- and low-forage diets. Dong RL; Chibisa GE; Beauchemin KA J Anim Sci; 2018 Apr; 96(3):783-796. PubMed ID: 29401247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the representativeness of behavior observation samples in classrooms. Tiger JH; Miller SJ; Mevers JL; Mintz JC; Scheithauer MC; Alvarez J J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(2):424-35. PubMed ID: 24114157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interval sampling methods and measurement error: a computer simulation. Wirth O; Slaven J; Taylor MA J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):83-100. PubMed ID: 24127380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of errors in sampling time and in activity measurement on the single sample clearance determination. De Sadeleer C; Piepsz A; Ham HR Nucl Med Commun; 2001 Apr; 22(4):429-32. PubMed ID: 11338054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of time-sample measures of behavior. Powell J; Martindale A; Kulp S J Appl Behav Anal; 1975; 8(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 16795509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of the 'Who's Challenging Who' support staff training intervention to improve attitudes and empathy towards adults with intellectual disability and challenging behaviours: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Randell E; Hastings RP; McNamara R; Knight R; Gillespie D; Taylor Z Trials; 2017 Oct; 18(1):460. PubMed ID: 28982380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of direct observational methods for measuring stereotypic behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders. Gardenier NC; MacDonald R; Green G Res Dev Disabil; 2004; 25(2):99-118. PubMed ID: 15026089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduction of stereotypic behaviours using differential reinforcement procedures and momentary restraint. Barton LE; Repp AC; Brulle AR J Ment Defic Res; 1985 Mar; 29 ( Pt 1)():71-9. PubMed ID: 4009705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dependability of data derived from time sampling methods with multiple observation targets. Johnson AH; Chafouleas SM; Briesch AM Sch Psychol Q; 2017 Mar; 32(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 27280360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]