These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4067072)

  • 1. The effect of competing melodies on melody recognition by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    de Laat JA; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Nov; 78(5):1574-7. PubMed ID: 4067072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of the adaptive music perception test.
    Kirchberger MJ; Russo FA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 25350404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can You Hear Out the Melody? Testing Musical Scene Perception in Young Normal-Hearing and Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Siedenburg K; Röttges S; Wagener KC; Hohmann V
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520945826. PubMed ID: 32895034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensorineural hearing loss degrades behavioral and physiological measures of human spatial selective auditory attention.
    Dai L; Best V; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Apr; 115(14):E3286-E3295. PubMed ID: 29555752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Role of Temporal Envelope and Fine Structure in Mandarin Lexical Tone Perception in Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.
    Wang S; Dong R; Liu D; Wang Y; Liu B; Zhang L; Xu L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129710. PubMed ID: 26052707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in listeners with cochlear hearing loss.
    Grose JH; Hall JW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 39(6):1149-58. PubMed ID: 8959600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Nogaki G
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 17485980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spontaneous musical auditory perceptions in patients who develop abrupt bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. An uninhibition syndrome?
    Goycoolea M; Mena I; Neubauer S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 126(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 16608788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the Pitch Strength of Bandpass Noise in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Horbach M; Verhey JL; Hots J
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787067. PubMed ID: 30009682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory function and speech understanding in listeners who qualify for EAS surgery.
    Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Spahr AJ; Bacon SP
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):114S-118S. PubMed ID: 17496661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects.
    Tomlin D; Rance G; Graydon K; Tsialios I
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):580-8. PubMed ID: 17062499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mandarin lexical tone recognition in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Wang S; Liu B; Zhang H; Dong R; Mannell R; Newall P; Chen X; Qi B; Zhang L; Han D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Jan; 133(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 23240663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of dissonance by people with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss.
    Tufts JB; Molis MR; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):955-67. PubMed ID: 16158651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Smoski WJ; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1541-7. PubMed ID: 3711453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
    Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers.
    Humes LE; Dirks DD; Bell TS; Kincaid GE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):765-73. PubMed ID: 3584685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectro-temporal analysis in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Hall JW; Davis AC; Haggard MP; Pillsbury HC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1325-31. PubMed ID: 3198867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral and binaural loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Oetting D; Hohmann V; Appell JE; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():179-192. PubMed ID: 27006003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.