These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4067074)

  • 1. Is real-ear attenuation at threshold a function of hearing level?
    Berger EH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Nov; 78(5):1588-95. PubMed ID: 4067074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices.
    Berger EH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jun; 79(6):1655-87. PubMed ID: 3522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
    Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Attenuation of ultrasonic noise in the 10-16 kHz frequency range by earplugs].
    Kozłowski E; Młyński R
    Med Pr; 2018 Aug; 69(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 29953113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part II: Modeling the external ear, simulating bone conduction, and comparing test fixture and real-ear data.
    Schroeter J; Poesselt C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):505-27. PubMed ID: 3745683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spectral analysis of hearing protector impulsive insertion loss.
    Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Murphy WJ; Stergar ME
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):13-21. PubMed ID: 27885881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold.
    Berger EH; Kerivan JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 6886201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation.
    Valentin O; John SM; Laville F
    Noise Health; 2017; 19(86):1-9. PubMed ID: 28164933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring helmet sound attenuation characteristics using an acoustic manikin.
    Ivey ES; Nerbonne GP; Tolhurst GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):370-5. PubMed ID: 3558955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of hearing protection on narrowband signal detection in industrial noise.
    Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1983 Apr; 12(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 6864854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of the attenuation characteristics of nonlinear hearing protective devices using the auditory brain stem response.
    Wilde GL; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):730-3. PubMed ID: 3584681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility.
    Murphy WJ; Franks JR; Berger EH; Behar A; Casali JG; Dixon-Ernst C; Krieg EF; Mozo BT; Royster JD; Royster LH; Simon SD; Stephenson C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):311-23. PubMed ID: 14759024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
    Giguère C; Kunov H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.