These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Photoacoustic ultrasound: pulse production and detection of 0.5% Liposyn. Kruger RA; Liu P Med Phys; 1994 Jul; 21(7):1179-84. PubMed ID: 7968851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects. Krasovitski B; Frenkel V; Shoham S; Kimmel E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Feb; 108(8):3258-63. PubMed ID: 21300891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An annular superposition integral for axisymmetric radiators. Kelly JF; McGough RJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):759-65. PubMed ID: 17348500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interaction of an ultrasound-activated contrast microbubble with a wall at arbitrary separation distances. Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(20):7909-25. PubMed ID: 26407104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FDTD simulation of finite-amplitude pressure and temperature fields for biomedical ultrasound. Hallaj IM; Cleveland RO J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):L7-12. PubMed ID: 10335650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absorption in liver at the focus of an ultrasonic shock wave field. Fry FJ; Reilly CR; Dines KA; Etchison MR; Trauner EJ Ultrasound Med Biol; 1991; 17(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 2021013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new anechoic material for medical ultrasonic applications. Zeqiri B; Bickley CJ Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 26(3):481-5. PubMed ID: 10773380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frequency dependence of the acoustic radiation force acting on absorbing cylindrical shells. Mitri FG Ultrasonics; 2005 Feb; 43(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 15567204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Density, ultrasound velocity, acoustic impedance, reflection and absorption coefficient determination of liquids via multiple reflection method. Hoche S; Hussein MA; Becker T Ultrasonics; 2015 Mar; 57():65-71. PubMed ID: 25465962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial and acoustic pressure dependence of microbubble-mediated gene delivery targeted using focused ultrasound. Rahim AA; Taylor SL; Bush NL; ter Haar GR; Bamber JC; Porter CD J Gene Med; 2006 Nov; 8(11):1347-57. PubMed ID: 16981246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonlinear change of on-axis pressure and intensity maxima positions and its relation with the linear focal shift effect. Makov YN; Sánchez-Morcillo VJ; Camarena F; Espinosa V Ultrasonics; 2008 Dec; 48(8):678-86. PubMed ID: 18442837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]