These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock. Reed P; Yoshino T Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system. Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The strength of the orienting response during Pavlovian conditioning. Kaye H; Pearce JM J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Jan; 10(1):90-109. PubMed ID: 6707583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observing responses maintained by stimuli associated with cocaine or remifentanil reinforcement in rhesus monkeys. Woods JH; Winger GD Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):345-51. PubMed ID: 12373435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change. Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between reinforcement rate and response rate in Pavlovian and operant conditioning with compound stimuli in rats. Carneiro AG; Paes G; Garcia-Mijares M Behav Processes; 2021 Oct; 191():104463. PubMed ID: 34293458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of amphetamine on differential reinforcement of low rates of responding. Saulsgiver KA; McClure EA; Wynne CD Behav Pharmacol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 17351419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]