These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4067496)

  • 1. Control of myoelectrical responses through reinforcement.
    Laurenti-Lions L; Gallego J; Chambille B; Vardon G; Jacquemin C
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Sep; 44(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 4067496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Myoelectrical operant conditioning in man].
    Laurenti-Lions L; Gallego J; Chambille B; Vardon G; Jacquemin C
    J Physiol (Paris); 1982-1983; 78(9):827-32. PubMed ID: 7187768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
    Reed P; Yoshino T
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Operant conditioning of a small-scale muscle response.
    Sasmor RM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 Jan; 9(1):69-85. PubMed ID: 5903967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-amplitude sucking and newborns: the quest for underlying mechanisms.
    Floccia C; Christophe A; Bertoncini J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Feb; 64(2):175-98. PubMed ID: 9120380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus change dis-habituates operant responding supported by water reinforcers.
    McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES; Wiediger RS
    Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 16112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responses eliminated by noncontingent or negatively contingent reinforcement recover in extinction.
    Lindblom LL; Jenkins HM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):175-90. PubMed ID: 7241053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure to combined static and 60 Hz magnetic fields: failure to replicate a reported behavioral effect.
    Stern S; Laties VG; Nguyen QA; Cox C
    Bioelectromagnetics; 1996; 17(4):279-92. PubMed ID: 8891187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of increments in noise intensity by monkeys.
    Clopton BM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 May; 17(3):473-81. PubMed ID: 4624513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus.
    Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Jul; 9(3):225-47. PubMed ID: 6153052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Free-operant compounding of variable-interval and low-rate discriminative stimuli.
    Weiss SJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Nov; 10(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 6080831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The strength of the orienting response during Pavlovian conditioning.
    Kaye H; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Jan; 10(1):90-109. PubMed ID: 6707583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Observing responses maintained by stimuli associated with cocaine or remifentanil reinforcement in rhesus monkeys.
    Woods JH; Winger GD
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):345-51. PubMed ID: 12373435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between reinforcement rate and response rate in Pavlovian and operant conditioning with compound stimuli in rats.
    Carneiro AG; Paes G; Garcia-Mijares M
    Behav Processes; 2021 Oct; 191():104463. PubMed ID: 34293458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of amphetamine on differential reinforcement of low rates of responding.
    Saulsgiver KA; McClure EA; Wynne CD
    Behav Pharmacol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 17351419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. H-reflex operant conditioning in mice.
    Carp JS; Tennissen AM; Chen XY; Wolpaw JR
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Oct; 96(4):1718-27. PubMed ID: 16837659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential resurgence and response elimination.
    Doughty AH; da Silva SP; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 17395402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence of interaction between deprivation effects and stimulus control.
    Powell RW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul; 16(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 5142390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.