These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4068394)

  • 1. [Effects of noise letters upon selective identification of letters].
    Watanabe I
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1985 Aug; 56(3):125-31. PubMed ID: 4068394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The effects of spatial arrangement upon selective letter perception].
    Watanabe I
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1983 Jun; 54(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 6674666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Effects of size of letters on selective identification of letters].
    Watanabe I
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1989 Apr; 60(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 2796040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task.
    Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M; Demetriou C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Dec; 66(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 22686154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention.
    LaBerge D; Brown V; Carter M; Bash D; Hartley A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 1826323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Top-Down Processes Override Bottom-Up Interference in the Flanker Task.
    Avital-Cohen R; Tsal Y
    Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 27(5):651-8. PubMed ID: 26993739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of visual and phonological features on the hemispheric processing of hierarchical Navon letters.
    Aiello M; Merola S; Lasaponara S; Pinto M; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():75-85. PubMed ID: 29233717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of the binocular disparity differences between targets and maskers on visual search.
    Gao YY; Schneider B; Li L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):459-472. PubMed ID: 27943121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for magnocellular involvement in the identification of flanked letters.
    Omtzigt D; Hendriks AW; Kolk HH
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(12):1881-90. PubMed ID: 12207987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From word superiority to word inferiority: visual processing of letters and words in pure alexia.
    Habekost T; Petersen A; Behrmann M; Starrfelt R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2014; 31(5-6):413-36. PubMed ID: 24801564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On letter frequency effects.
    New B; Grainger J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Oct; 138(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 21855049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The time course of visual influences in letter recognition.
    Madec S; Le Goff K; Riès SK; Legou T; Rousselet G; Courrieu P; Alario FX; Grainger J; Rey A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):406-14. PubMed ID: 26742753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning letter identification in peripheral vision.
    Chung ST; Levi DM; Tjan BS
    Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(11):1399-412. PubMed ID: 15743610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shared versus separate processes for letter and digit identification.
    McCloskey M; Schubert T
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2014; 31(5-6):437-60. PubMed ID: 24404944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Top-down and bottom-up competition in visual stimuli processing.
    Ligeza TS; Tymorek AD; Wyczesany M
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2017; 77(4):305-316. PubMed ID: 29369296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiation of holistic processing in the time course of letter recognition.
    Lachmann T; van Leeuwen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 18586218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subjectively homogeneous noise over written text as a tool to investigate the perceptual mechanisms involved in reading.
    Poirier FJ; Gosselin F; Arguin M
    J Vis; 2013 Sep; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 24065451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two distinct parsing stages in nonword reading aloud: Evidence from Russian.
    Schmalz X; Porshnev A; Marinus E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2548-2559. PubMed ID: 27737619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of hemispheric asymmetry in global and local information processing and interference in divided and selective attention using spatial frequency filters.
    Yoshida T; Yoshino A; Takahashi Y; Nomura S
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(3):519-29. PubMed ID: 17476490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implied reading direction and prioritization of letter encoding.
    Holcombe AO; Nguyen EHL; Goodbourn PT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Oct; 146(10):1420-1437. PubMed ID: 28891656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.