These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4069102)
1. PRO release of medical information. Implications for Missouri physicians and hospitals. Akhter MN Mo Med; 1985 Nov; 82(11):695-7. PubMed ID: 4069102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. PSROs: implications for legal liability. Springer EW Hosp Med Staff; 1975 Jan; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10273071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Statutory protection for peer review committees--can it be waived? Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1988 Jul; 77(7):586-7. PubMed ID: 3171431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Illinois Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of state peer review act. Peterson RN Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jun; 7(13):3-4. PubMed ID: 10273522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical review organizations: a model state immunity statute. Kopit WG; Shapiro LE; Eaton KB Group Pract; 1980 Apr; 29(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Confidentiality and disclosure of information by Professional Standards Review Organizations. Fed Regist; 1978 Jan; 43(10 Pt 2):2281-4. PubMed ID: 10304671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legislative currents. Acquisition, protection, and disclosure of PRO information. Cofer J J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Jul; 55(7):43-6. PubMed ID: 10310705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Disclosure of confidential information to and by professional review organizations. Roach WH Top Health Rec Manage; 1985 Dec; 6(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 10274706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Confidentiality and disclosure of Professional Standards Review Organization (PSRO) information: proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1979 Jan; 44(10):3058-66. PubMed ID: 10273117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Negotiating the memorandum of understanding for delegated PSRO review. Rossman C Mich Hosp; 1979 Aug; 15(8):8-10. PubMed ID: 10273167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Physician peer review: have we gone far enough or too far? Cardwell MS; Gay JW Mo Med; 1991 Apr; 88(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 1857331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicare program; acquisition, protection and disclosure of utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) information--HCFA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1984 Apr; 49(74):14977-86. PubMed ID: 10273479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Thumbing through medical records: confidentiality vs. the need to know. Jackson CB Internist; 1980 Apr; 21(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 10273188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Suit surfaces questions on status of PSROs. Blum JD Hosp Med Staff; 1979 Jan; 8(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 10273120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Access to medical records: current developments. Roach WH Top Health Rec Manage; 1982 Jun; 2(4):83-9. PubMed ID: 10273300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Disclosure of information to and by peer review organizations. Hawthorne KJ Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Sep; 9(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 10302725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in PRO review in Missouri to be more evolutionary than revolutionary. Jaco D Mo Med; 1991 Nov; 88(11):739-42. PubMed ID: 1805125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. PSROs: a magical medical mystery tour. Bogue T Health Law Proj Libr Bull; 1979 Jun; 4(6):180-5. PubMed ID: 10273181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]