These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4069768)

  • 1. A reappraisal of pre-transfusion testing procedures in a hospital blood bank.
    Lown JA; Barr AL; Jackson JM
    Pathology; 1985 Jul; 17(3):489-92. PubMed ID: 4069768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective study to determine the safety of omitting the antiglobulin crossmatch from pretransfusion testing.
    Heddle NM; O'Hoski P; Singer J; McBride JA; Ali MA; Kelton JG
    Br J Haematol; 1992 Aug; 81(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 1390245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the indirect antiglobulin crossmatch justified?
    Peterson DM; Roxby DJ; Seshadri R
    Pathology; 1987 Apr; 19(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 3502613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relative utility of the autologous control and the antiglobulin test phase of the crossmatch.
    Perkins JT; Arruza M; Fong K; Sosler SD; Saporito C
    Transfusion; 1990; 30(6):503-7. PubMed ID: 2378021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eighteen months' experience with a manual polybrene crossmatch in a large hospital transfusion laboratory.
    Lown JA; Johnson W; Ivey JG
    Vox Sang; 1988; 55(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 3218167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Substitution of the "group-and-screen" for the full crossmatch in elective operations.
    Kelton JG; Perrault RA; Blajchman MA
    Can Anaesth Soc J; 1983 Nov; 30(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 6640401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experience with the routine use of an abbreviated crossmatch.
    Shulman IA; Nelson JM; Saxena S; Thompson JC; Okamoto M; Kent DR; Nakayama RK
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Aug; 82(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 6465079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions following antibody screening and immediate-spin crossmatching.
    Pinkerton PH; Coovadia AS; Goldstein J
    Transfusion; 1992; 32(9):814-7. PubMed ID: 1471244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indirect antiglobulin test-crossmatch using low-ionic-strength saline-albumin enhancement medium and reduced incubation time: effectiveness in the detection of most clinically significant antibodies and impact on blood utilization.
    Dinardo CL; Bonifácio SL; Mendrone A
    Immunohematology; 2014; 30(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25238242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Solid-phase antiglobulin test for screening and identification of red cell antibodies.
    Uthemann H; Poschmann A
    Transfusion; 1990 Feb; 30(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 2305439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Blood type and screen for crossmatch].
    Taniwaki K
    Rinsho Byori; 1989 Jul; 37(7):745-9. PubMed ID: 2607645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of the polyethyleneglycol antiglobulin test in the detection and identification of erythrocyte antibodies].
    Jiménez Marco MT; Hernández Maraver D; Rodríguez de la Rua A; de la Cámara Mendizábal C; Canales Albendea M; Jiménez Yuste V; Hernández Navarro F
    Sangre (Barc); 1998 Feb; 43(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 9577178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A hemolytic reaction implicating Sda antibody missed by immediate spin crossmatch.
    Reznicek MJ; Cordle DG; Strauss RG
    Vox Sang; 1992; 62(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 1609519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is a room-temperature crossmatch necessary for the detection of ABO errors?
    Trudeau LR; Judd WJ; Butch SH; Oberman HA
    Transfusion; 1983; 23(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 6679378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a manual hexadimethrine bromide-antiglobulin test with saline- and albumin-antiglobulin tests for pretransfusion testing.
    Mintz PD; Anderson G
    Transfusion; 1987; 27(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 3824470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized delivery control--a useful and safe complement to the type and screen compatibility testing.
    Säfwenberg J; Högman CF; Cassemar B
    Vox Sang; 1997; 72(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 9145486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased efficiency of transfusion practice in routine surgery using pre-operative antibody screening and selective ordering with an abbreviated crossmatch.
    Dodsworth H; Dudley HA
    Br J Surg; 1985 Feb; 72(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 3971112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety and cost-containment data that advocate abbreviated pretransfusion testing.
    Cordle DG; Strauss RG; Snyder EL; Floss AM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Oct; 94(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 2220670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limitations of the immediate spin crossmatch when used for detecting ABO incompatibility.
    Berry-Dortch S; Woodside CH; Boral LI
    Transfusion; 1985; 25(2):176-8. PubMed ID: 3984013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multicenter prospective observational study on the use of type and screen method versus conventional type and crossmatch policy for pre-transfusion testing in the Indian population.
    Mathur A; Jindal A; Tiwari AK; Bhuyan D; Jagannathan L; Sawant RB; Basu S; Reddy M; Datta SS
    Immunohematology; 2022 Sep; 38(3):100-105. PubMed ID: 36190198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.