These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4069768)

  • 21. Experience with a cost-effective crossmatch protocol.
    Shulman IA; Nelson JM; Kent DR; Jacobs VL; Nakayama RK; Malone SA
    JAMA; 1985 Jul; 254(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 3999355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [3 new antibody detection tests. A comparative study].
    Mempel W; Alraun K; Leeping M; Kirschner M; Reiser H; Heim MU
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():362-6. PubMed ID: 1703872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The computer crossmatch: a safe alternative to the serological crossmatch.
    Chapman JF; Milkins C; Voak D
    Transfus Med; 2000 Dec; 10(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 11123808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Red cell alloimmunization in a transfused patient population: a study from a tertiary care hospital in north India.
    Thakral B; Saluja K; Sharma RR; Marwaha N
    Hematology; 2008 Oct; 13(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 18854096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do patients with autoantibodies or clinically insignificant alloantibodies require an indirect antiglobulin test crossmatch?
    Lee E; Redman M; Burgess G; Win N
    Transfusion; 2007 Jul; 47(7):1290-5. PubMed ID: 17581166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Revisiting the issue: can the reading for serologic reactivity following 37 degrees C incubation be omitted?
    Judd WJ; Fullen DR; Steiner EA; Davenport RD; Knafl PC
    Transfusion; 1999 Mar; 39(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 10204593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prevalence of clinically significant antibodies in patients undergoing elective surgery in a Nigerian teaching hospital: A case for the type and screen method.
    Obi EI; Pughikumo OC; Korubo KI; Ejele AO
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Feb; 23(2):138-146. PubMed ID: 32031086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pretransfusion testing without serologic crossmatch: approaches to ensure patient safety.
    Kuriyan M; Fox E
    Vox Sang; 2000; 78(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 10765147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Incompatible crossmatch following nonreactive antibody detection test. Frequency and cause.
    Mintz PD; Haines AL; Sullivan MF
    Transfusion; 1982; 22(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 7071913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The evaluation of a positive direct antiglobulin test (autocontrol) in pretransfusion testing revisited.
    Judd WJ; Barnes BA; Steiner EA; Oberman HA; Averill DB; Butch SH
    Transfusion; 1986; 26(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 3705135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A proposal for compatibility testing incorporating the manual hexadimethrine bromide (Polybrene) test.
    Steane EA; Steane SM; Montgomery SR; Pearson JR
    Transfusion; 1985; 25(6):540-4. PubMed ID: 4071598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the polyethylene glycol-indirect antiglobulin test for routine compatibility testing.
    Slater JL; Griswold DJ; Wojtyniak LS; Reisling MJ
    Transfusion; 1989 Oct; 29(8):686-8. PubMed ID: 2799893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anti-i causing acute hemolysis following a negative immediate-spin crossmatch.
    Judd WJ; Steiner EA; Abruzzo LV; Davenport RD; Oberman HA; Pehta JC; Nance SJ
    Transfusion; 1992; 32(6):572-5. PubMed ID: 1502712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pediatric preoperative blood ordering: when is a type and screen or crossmatch really needed?
    Fernández AM; Cronin J; Greenberg RS; Heitmiller ES
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Feb; 24(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 23957750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of the manual Polybrene test in the routine hospital laboratory.
    Fisher GA
    Transfusion; 1983; 23(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 6340270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Resolution of red cell compatibility testing problems in patients receiving anti-lymphoblast or anti-thymocyte globulin.
    Swanson JL; Issitt CH; Mann EW; Condie RM; Simmons RL; McCullough J
    Transfusion; 1984; 24(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 6710586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transfusion significance of Lewis system antibodies. Report on a nationwide survey.
    Waheed A; Kennedy MS; Gerhan S
    Transfusion; 1981; 21(5):542-5. PubMed ID: 7292583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Role of the crossmatch in testing for serologic incompatibility.
    Oberman HA; Barnes BA; Steiner EA
    Transfusion; 1982; 22(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 6801826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The risk of an overt hemolytic transfusion reaction following the use of an immediate spin crossmatch.
    Shulman IA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Apr; 114(4):412-4. PubMed ID: 2322101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The value of crossmatch tests and panel tests as a screening tool to predict the outcome of platelet transfusion in a non-selected haematological population of patients.
    Levin MD; van der Holt B; de Veld JC; Gratama JW; de Vries W; van't Veer MB
    Vox Sang; 2004 Nov; 87(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 15585026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.