These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4070361)

  • 1. Comparison of ionisation measurements in water and polystyrene for electron beam dosimetry.
    Bruinvis IA; Heukelom S; Mijnheer BJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1985 Oct; 30(10):1043-53. PubMed ID: 4070361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurements of ionisation in water, polystyrene and a 'solid water' phantom material for electron beams.
    Thwaites DI
    Phys Med Biol; 1985 Jan; 30(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 3975275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fluence correction factors in plastic phantoms for clinical proton beams.
    Palmans H; Symons JE; Denis JM; de Kock EA; Jones DT; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3055-71. PubMed ID: 12361210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparisons of electron beam dose measurements in water and polystyrene using various dosimeters.
    Kase KR; Adler GJ; Bjärngard BE
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6804767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electron fluence correction factors for conversion of dose in plastic to dose in water.
    Ding GX; Rogers DW; Cygler JE; Mackie TR
    Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 9048356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo study of correction factors for the use of plastic phantoms in clinical electron dosimetry.
    Araki F
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4368-77. PubMed ID: 18072502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling skin collimation using the electron pencil beam redefinition algorithm.
    Chi PC; Hogstrom KR; Starkschall G; Antolak JA; Boyd RA
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3409-18. PubMed ID: 16370427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental determination of depth-scaling factors and central axis depth dose for clinical electron beams.
    Huq MS; Yue N; Suntharalingam N
    Int J Cancer; 2001 Aug; 96(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 11474497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
    Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correction factors for Farmer-type chambers for absorbed dose determination in 60Co and 192Ir brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Tölli H; Johansson KA
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3171-81. PubMed ID: 9832009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energy correction factors of LiF powder TLDs irradiated in high-energy electron beams and applied to mailed dosimetry for quality assurance networks.
    Marre D; Ferreira IH; Bridier A; Björeland A; Svensson H; Dutreix A; Chavaudra J
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Dec; 45(12):3657-74. PubMed ID: 11131191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative electron beam measurements: scaling depths in clear polystyrene to equivalent depths in water.
    Ten Haken RK; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(3):410-3. PubMed ID: 3600533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The calibration of plane parallel ionisation chambers for the measurement of absorbed dose in electron beams of low to medium energies. Part 1: the NACP chamber.
    Cross P; Freeman N
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Sep; 19(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 8936730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo calculations of correction factors for plastic phantoms in clinical photon and electron beam dosimetry.
    Araki F; Hanyu Y; Fukuoka M; Matsumoto K; Okumura M; Oguchi H
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2992-3001. PubMed ID: 19673198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of film measurements and Monte Carlo simulations of dose delivered with very high-energy electron beams in a polystyrene phantom.
    Bazalova-Carter M; Liu M; Palma B; Dunning M; McCormick D; Hemsing E; Nelson J; Jobe K; Colby E; Koong AC; Tantawi S; Dolgashev V; Maxim PG; Loo BW
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1606-13. PubMed ID: 25832051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interface perturbation effects in high-energy electron beams.
    Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 48(6):687-705. PubMed ID: 12699189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electron backscatter corrections for parallel-plate chambers.
    Hunt MA; Kutcher GJ; Buffa A
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 3127670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mean energy, energy-range relationships and depth-scaling factors for clinical electron beams.
    Ding GX; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 8815379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.
    Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.