These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4071181)

  • 1. Vacuum extraction during cesarean section.
    Boehm FH
    South Med J; 1985 Dec; 78(12):1502. PubMed ID: 4071181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of vacuum extractor for head delivery at Cesarean section.
    Bercovici B
    Isr J Med Sci; 1980 Mar; 16(3):201-3. PubMed ID: 7390761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of the vacuum extractor for delivery of the fetal head at cesarean section.
    Nakano R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Oct; 141(4):475-6. PubMed ID: 7282838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ABC of labour care: operative delivery.
    Chamberlain G; Steer P
    BMJ; 1999 May; 318(7193):1260-4. PubMed ID: 10231260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Letter: Pregnancy interruption by vacuum aspiration].
    Gergely G
    Orv Hetil; 1975 Nov; 116(46):2748-9. PubMed ID: 1196609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Our experience with vacuum extraction during labor].
    Andrýs J; Podholová M
    Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove Suppl; 1976; 19(5):679-84. PubMed ID: 1088622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The vacuum extraction to forceps in posterior presentation comparison.
    Escamilla JO; Escamilla GH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1398-9. PubMed ID: 9215210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Delivery of Siamese twins with the aid of vacuum extraction].
    Reszczyński A; Marczewski A
    Ginekol Pol; 1980 Jan; 51(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 7364310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Modification of the vacuum extraction device (author's transl)].
    Saling E
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1978 Feb; 182(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 645169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Is rotation in vacuum extraction possible?].
    Liu MM; Beller FK
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Jul; 47(7):487-9. PubMed ID: 3623051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [VACUUM EXTRACTION].
    ANDREAS H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1963 Sep; 85():1379-88. PubMed ID: 14086397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forceps and vacuum extraction.
    Chamberlain G
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Dec; 7(3):511-27. PubMed ID: 7011647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A case of hydatidiform mole as a toxic syndrome in a very young woman treated successfully using the vacuum extraction method].
    Curciev K; Lekovski G; Janevski M
    God Zb Med Fak Skopje; 1976; 22():601-6. PubMed ID: 1024923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vacuum extraction: use in a small rural hospital.
    Sennett ES; Fallis GB
    Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Sep; 129(6):575-8. PubMed ID: 6883259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reverse breech extraction for cesarean section.
    Iffy L; Apuzzio JJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 May; 126(1):126; author reply 127. PubMed ID: 16387408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [ON VACUUM EXTRACTION].
    IGEL H
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1964 Jul; 58():738-41. PubMed ID: 14252986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The vacuum extractor in difficult labor.
    Chukwudebelu WO
    Int Surg; 1977 Feb; 62(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 844973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new method of traction for the vacuum cup.
    O'Neil AG; Skull E; Michael C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Feb; 21(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 6942820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Indications and contraindications for artificial delivery].
    Essed GG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1992 Jun; 136(26):1237-43. PubMed ID: 1620251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Chan et all retrospective study of vacuum versus forceps is really a study of difference of practice and not a study of different instruments.
    Rae PB
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 Nov; 40(4):479. PubMed ID: 11194449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.