These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4071181)

  • 41. [Methods of delivery in patients with previous cesarean section at the Obstetrical and Gynecological Clinic of Perugia in the 5-year period 1972--1976].
    Gerli M; Gilardi G; Giannone E; Ballerani M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1978 Nov; 30(11):989-92. PubMed ID: 733112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Operative obstetrics--section, vacuum, forceps. Clinical results in 3,742 cases 1966 to 1980].
    Hohlweg-Majert P; Rüdenauer R; Seifert R; Stoll P
    Fortschr Med; 1985 May; 103(17):450-2. PubMed ID: 3997028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Use of the soft, silicone obstetric vacuum cup for delivery of the fetal head at cesarean section.
    Pelosi MA; Apuzzio J
    J Reprod Med; 1984 Apr; 29(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 6716375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Early office termination of pregnancy by soft cannula vacuum aspiration.
    Meyer JH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 147(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 6614101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Breech presentation: management (304 cases)].
    Dubois C; Dufour P; Quandalle F; Lanvin D; Levasseur M; Monnier JC
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1998 May; 26(5):363-71. PubMed ID: 9648380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Vacuum versus forceps].
    Dapunt O; Heim K; Weiss D
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1993; 33 Suppl 1():157-61. PubMed ID: 8118251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Forceps versus vacuum].
    Gruber W; Chalubinski K; Ulm M
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1993; 33 Suppl 1():162-4. PubMed ID: 8118253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Towards safe practice in instrumental vaginal delivery.
    Edozien LC
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):639-55. PubMed ID: 17466598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. SMFM Special Statement: Operative vaginal delivery: checklists for performance and documentation.
    ; ; Staat B; Combs CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):B15-B21. PubMed ID: 32354409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Comparative analysis of forceps delivery and vacuum extraction based on our data].
    Woytoń J; Geneja M; Riess A; Szacki J; Runge T; Myśkow M; Gabryś M; Bielanow T
    Ginekol Pol; 1985 Mar; 56(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 4054671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Does internal podalic version of the non-vertex second twin still have a place in obstetrics? A Danish national retrospective cohort study.
    Jonsdottir F; Henriksen L; Secher NJ; Maaløe N
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 25283062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Instrumental deliveries in Denmark during the years 1970-1978].
    Jessen P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1982 Feb; 144(6):417-20. PubMed ID: 7071987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries.
    Greis JB; Bieniarz J; Scommegna A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 7219906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Vacuum extractor.
    Kappy KA
    Clin Perinatol; 1981 Feb; 8(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 7016394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Modified manual rotation in midpelvic delivery.
    Goodlin RC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jan; 67(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 3940326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury.
    Towner D; Castro MA; Eby-Wilkens E; Gilbert WM
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Dec; 341(23):1709-14. PubMed ID: 10580069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The mounting rate of cesarean sections. Is it accompanied by a drop in instrumental births?
    Gharaibeh AM; Al-Bdour AE; Akasheh HF
    Saudi Med J; 2008 Feb; 29(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 18246239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.