BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4071377)

  • 1. A simple, inexpensive technique for clearing obstructed closed suction drainage catheters.
    Sondak VK; Morton DL
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Dec; 161(6):594-6. PubMed ID: 4071377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple inexpensive technique for placing drainage catheters through the skin.
    Adams CW; McPhail JF
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Dec; 165(6):540-1. PubMed ID: 3686319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Closed wound suction drainage.
    Chinn SD; Burns A
    J Foot Surg; 1985; 24(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 3973352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A minimalist approach to the care of the indwelling closed suction drain: a prospective analysis of local wound complications.
    Reid RR; Dumanian GA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2003 Dec; 51(6):575-8. PubMed ID: 14646652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Closed suction or penrose drainage after partial nephrectomy: does it matter?
    Sánchez-Ortiz R; Madsen LT; Swanson DA; Canfield SE; Wood CG
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):244-6. PubMed ID: 14665885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Gravity drainage versus suction drainage: an experimental and clinical study].
    Gerngross H; Engler V
    Unfallchirurg; 1989 Jan; 92(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2644695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Removal of tracheal secretions in anesthetized dogs: balloon catheters versus suction.
    Leiman BC; Katz J; Stanley TH; Butler BD
    Anesth Analg; 1987 Jun; 66(6):529-32. PubMed ID: 3107432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overnight closed suction drainage after axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.
    Liu CD; McFadden DW
    Am Surg; 1997 Oct; 63(10):868-70. PubMed ID: 9322660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Half versus full vacuum suction drainage after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer- a prospective randomized clinical trial[ISRCTN24484328].
    Chintamani ; Singhal V; Singh J; Bansal A; Saxena S
    BMC Cancer; 2005 Jan; 5():11. PubMed ID: 15676064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of closed wound suction drainage after single-level lumbar laminectomy.
    Payne DH; Fischgrund JS; Herkowitz HN; Barry RL; Kurz LT; Montgomery DM
    J Spinal Disord; 1996 Oct; 9(5):401-3. PubMed ID: 8938608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A prospective randomized study of wound drainage versus non-drainage in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty].
    Mengal B; Aebi J; Rodriguez A; Lemaire R
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Feb; 87(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11240535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new technique to maintain closed-suction drainage catheter function.
    Wackym PA; Ellison DE; Ward PH
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1987 Jan; 113(1):57-8. PubMed ID: 3790286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does fibrin sealant reduce drain output and allow earlier removal of drainage catheters in women undergoing operation for breast cancer?
    Langer S; Guenther JM; DiFronzo LA
    Am Surg; 2003 Jan; 69(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 12575787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings.
    Horattas MC; Trupiano J; Hopkins S; Pasini D; Martino C; Murty A
    Am J Infect Control; 2001 Feb; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11172316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Drains in trauma surgery].
    Jagodzinski M; Krettek C
    Chirurg; 2003 Feb; 74(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 12599028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simple procedure for relieving obstruction of sump catheters.
    Vroemen JP; von Meyenfeldt MF; Soeters PB
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Sep; 165(3):267-8. PubMed ID: 3629441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of the Mini-Flap wound suction drain in maxillofacial surgery.
    Nasser NA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1986 May; 68(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 3729265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-pressure gradients generated by closed-suction surgical drainage systems.
    Grobmyer SR; Graham D; Brennan MF; Coit D
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2002; 3(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 12542925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-vacuum drains rival conventional underwater-seal drains after pediatric heart surgery.
    Newcomb AE; Alphonso N; Nørgaard MA; Cochrane AD; Karl TR; Brizard CP
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):395-9; discussion 399-400. PubMed ID: 15740945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simplified method for repeated nasotracheal suction.
    Pode D; Manny J
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Aug; 159(2):173-4. PubMed ID: 6463830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.