These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4071598)

  • 41. The risk of abbreviating the major crossmatch in urgent or massive transfusion.
    Oberman HA; Barnes BA; Friedman BA
    Transfusion; 1978; 18(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 417431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hemolytic transfusion reaction due to Rh antibodies detectable only by manual polybrene and polyethylene glycol technique.
    Lin CK; Wong KF; Mak KH; Yuen CM; Lee AW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Dec; 104(6):660-2. PubMed ID: 8526209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Optimal blood grouping and antibody screening for safe transfusion.
    Makarovska-Bojadzieva T; Blagoevska M; Kolevski P; Kostovska S
    Prilozi; 2009 Jul; 30(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 19736535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Safety in transfusion practice. Is it safe to eliminate the major crossmatch for selected patients?
    Shulman IA; Kent D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Mar; 113(3):270-2. PubMed ID: 2919957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Manual polybrene method for pretransfusion test could overcome the interference of daratumumab therapy in myeloma.
    Yeh TJ; Yeh CJ; Liu YC; Hsiao HH
    Transfusion; 2019 Aug; 59(8):2751-2752. PubMed ID: 31374150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Hemolytic anti-hr" (e) detectable solely by an automated polybrene technique.
    Snyder EL; Spivack M; Novodoff D; Kling G
    Transfusion; 1978; 18(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 415394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Prediction of crossmatch outcome in highly sensitized dialysis patients based on the identification of serum HLA antibodies.
    Oldfather JW; Anderson CB; Phelan DL; Cross DE; Luger AM; Rodey GE
    Transplantation; 1986 Sep; 42(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 3529527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A flow cytometric platelet immunofluorescence crossmatch for predicting successful HLA matched platelet transfusions.
    Sintnicolaas K; Löwenberg B
    Br J Haematol; 1996 Mar; 92(4):1005-10. PubMed ID: 8616059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Anti-i causing acute hemolysis following a negative immediate-spin crossmatch.
    Judd WJ; Steiner EA; Abruzzo LV; Davenport RD; Oberman HA; Pehta JC; Nance SJ
    Transfusion; 1992; 32(6):572-5. PubMed ID: 1502712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Evaluation of the test using polybrene for the detection of anti-erythrocyte antibodies].
    Lenkiewicz B
    Acta Haematol Pol; 1991; 22(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 1823954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Modification of standard Western pretransfusion testing procedures for Taiwan.
    Lin M; Broadberry RE
    Vox Sang; 1994; 67(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 7801612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Automated red cell antibody detection. An improved method.
    Dawes BJ; Goldsmith KL
    Vox Sang; 1975; 29(4):248-52. PubMed ID: 1146281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Is the indirect antiglobulin crossmatch justified?
    Peterson DM; Roxby DJ; Seshadri R
    Pathology; 1987 Apr; 19(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 3502613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Use of the manual Polybrene test in the routine hospital laboratory.
    Fisher GA
    Transfusion; 1983; 23(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 6340270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. False-negative compatible antiglobulin crossmatches in samples with alloantibodies to cognate red blood cell antigens.
    Nixon CP; Krohto SL; Sweeney JD
    Transfusion; 2018 Aug; 58(8):2022-2026. PubMed ID: 29687886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Type and screen method and Coombs crossmatch method for pretransfusion testing: A prospective comparative study in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi.
    Anu KD; Pahuja S; Sharma G
    Asian J Transfus Sci; 2022; 16(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 36199420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Frequency of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions following antibody screening and immediate-spin crossmatching.
    Pinkerton PH; Coovadia AS; Goldstein J
    Transfusion; 1992; 32(9):814-7. PubMed ID: 1471244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A reappraisal of pre-transfusion testing procedures in a hospital blood bank.
    Lown JA; Barr AL; Jackson JM
    Pathology; 1985 Jul; 17(3):489-92. PubMed ID: 4069768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A fully automated blood typing system for hospital transfusion services. ABS2000 Study Group.
    Sandler SG; Langeberg A; Avery N; Mintz PD
    Transfusion; 2000 Feb; 40(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 10686004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A prospective, observational study for optimization of antibody screening in pretransfusion compatibility testing.
    Pandey P; Setya D; Srivastava R; Singh MK
    Immunohematology; 2020 Jan; 36(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 32324041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.