These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4073204)

  • 1. Performance characteristics of a hydrophilic concentric bifocal contact lens.
    Erickson P; Robboy M
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 Oct; 62(10):702-8. PubMed ID: 4073204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stereopsis in presbyopes wearing monovision and simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses.
    McGill E; Erickson P
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Aug; 65(8):619-26. PubMed ID: 3177586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative visual performance of three presbyopic contact lens corrections.
    Back A; Grant T; Hine N
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Jun; 69(6):474-80. PubMed ID: 1641231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of target distance and pupil size on letter contrast sensitivity with simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses.
    Bradley A; Abdul Rahman H; Soni PS; Zhang X
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 8336909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting and assessing visual performance with multizone bifocal contact lenses.
    Martin JA; Roorda A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Dec; 80(12):812-9. PubMed ID: 14688544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical experience with the SimulVue soft bifocal contact lens.
    Bierly JR; Furgason TG; Litteral G; VanMeter WS
    CLAO J; 1995 Apr; 21(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 7796528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens.
    Guillon M; Maissa C; Cooper P; Girard-Claudon K; Poling TR
    CLAO J; 2002 Apr; 28(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 12054378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of the performance of the Menifocal Z gas-permeable bifocal contact lens during continuous wear.
    Lakkis C; Goldenberg SA; Woods CA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1022-9. PubMed ID: 16357643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulated in situ optical performance of bifocal contact lenses.
    Chateau N; Baude D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jul; 74(7):532-9. PubMed ID: 9293522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of accommodative response and visual performance in non-presbyopes wearing low-add contact lenses.
    Koh S; Inoue R; Sato S; Haruna M; Asonuma S; Nishida K
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Jun; 43(3):226-231. PubMed ID: 31327577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is binocular contrast sensitivity at distance compromised with multifocal soft contact lenses used to correct presbyopia?
    Soni PS; Patel R; Carlson RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):505-14. PubMed ID: 12858086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of the anterior constant focus (ACF) annular bifocal contact lens.
    Gussler JR; Lim ES; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1993 Oct; 19(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 8261605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective clinical evaluation of the Acuvue Bifocal contact lens.
    Key JE; Yee JL
    CLAO J; 1999 Oct; 25(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 10555737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.
    Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of vision with presbyopic contact lens correction: subjective and light sensitivity rating.
    Alongi S; Rolando M; Corallo G; Siniscalchi C; Monaco M; Saccà S; Verrastro G; Menoni S; Ravera GB; Calabria G
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Sep; 239(9):656-63. PubMed ID: 11688664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical performance of an innovative back surface multifocal contact lens in correcting presbyopia.
    Woods C; Ruston D; Hough T; Efron N
    CLAO J; 1999 Jul; 25(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 10444055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pupil diameter, working distance and illumination during habitual tasks. Implications for simultaneous vision contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Cardona G; López S
    J Optom; 2016; 9(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26481439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.