These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4073212)

  • 21. A comparison of stereopsis with ANVIS and F4949 night vision goggles.
    Knight KK; Apsey DA; Jackson WG; Dennis RJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1998 Feb; 69(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 9491245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.
    Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests.
    Fawcett SL
    J AAPOS; 2005 Dec; 9(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16414526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantification of Stereopsis in Patients with Impaired Binocularity.
    Han SB; Yang HK; Kim J; Hong K; Lee B; Hwang JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 93(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 26927523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of static and dynamic stereoacuity.
    Zinn WJ; Solomon H
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1985 Sep; 56(9):712-5. PubMed ID: 4056294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Symptomatic aniseikonia in unilateral and bilateral pseudophakia. A projection space eikonometer study.
    Kramer PW; Lubkin V; Pavlica M; Covin R
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 1999; 14(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 10553110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.
    Holmes JM; Fawcett SL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):193-5. PubMed ID: 15652852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development of stereoscopic acuity: longitudinal study using a computer-based random-dot stereo test.
    Takai Y; Sato M; Tan R; Hirai T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2005; 49(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15692766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pitfalls in the Use of Stereoacuity in the Diagnosis of Nonorganic Visual Loss.
    Sitko KR; Peragallo JH; Bidot S; Biousse V; Newman NJ; Bruce BB
    Ophthalmology; 2016 Jan; 123(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 26481817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Measuring stereoscopic vision using a stereo distance vision instrument and a new stereo near vision instrument].
    Römhild H; Feldes D
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Jan; 192(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 3352191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating stereoacuity with 3D shutter glasses technology.
    Wu H; Jin H; Sun Y; Wang Y; Ge M; Chen Y; Chi Y
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 16(1):45. PubMed ID: 27112418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stereoacuity development: 6 months to 5 years. A new tool for testing and screening.
    Ciner EB; Schanel-Klitsch E; Herzberg C
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jan; 73(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8867681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of test proximity and induced refractive error on stereoacuity.
    Larson W
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Oct; 64(10):796. PubMed ID: 3688183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Freiburg Stereoacuity Test: automatic measurement of stereo threshold.
    Bach M; Schmitt C; Kromeier M; Kommerell G
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Aug; 239(8):562-6. PubMed ID: 11585311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interobserver test-retest reliability of the Randot preschool stereoacuity test.
    Fawcett SL; Birch EE
    J AAPOS; 2000 Dec; 4(6):354-8. PubMed ID: 11124670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An evaluation of stereoacuity (3D vision) in practising surgeons across a range of surgical specialities.
    Biddle M; Hamid S; Ali N
    Surgeon; 2014 Feb; 12(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 23764432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Frisby Davis distance stereoacuity values in visually normal children.
    Adams WE; Hrisos S; Richardson S; Davis H; Frisby JP; Clarke MP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 89(11):1438-41. PubMed ID: 16234448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Binocular function in unilateral aphakia. Correlation with aniseikonia and stereoacuity.
    Katsumi O; Miyanaga Y; Hirose T; Okuno H; Asaoka I
    Ophthalmology; 1988 Aug; 95(8):1088-93. PubMed ID: 3231446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of Test Distance on Stereoacuity in Intermittent Exotropia.
    Seki Y; Wakayama A; Takahashi R; Umebara I; Tanabe F; Abe K; Shimomura Y
    Strabismus; 2017 Mar; 25(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 28156199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stereoacuity and depth perception decrease with increased instrument magnification: comparing a non-magnified system with lens loupes and a surgical microscope.
    Du LT; Wessels IF; Underdahl JP; Auran JD
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2001; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 11240937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.