These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4073624)

  • 21. Electrocutaneous stimulation for sensory communication in rehabilitation engineering.
    Szeto AY; Saunders FA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1982 Apr; 29(4):300-8. PubMed ID: 7068167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A self-powered, preprogrammable, constant current, electronic stimulator for implantation in conscious and unrestrained, small animals.
    Harrison JE; Avitable MJ; Gutstein WH
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1978 Mar; 44(3):405-8. PubMed ID: 76549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pattern identification and perceived stimulus quality as a function of stimulation waveform on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Mar; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12797720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fully automatic control of paraplegic FES pedaling using higher-order sliding mode and fuzzy logic control.
    Farhoud A; Erfanian A
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 May; 22(3):533-42. PubMed ID: 24760923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A 16-channel 8-parameter waveform electrotactile stimulation system.
    Kaczmarek KA; Kramer KM; Webster JG; Radwin RG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Oct; 38(10):933-43. PubMed ID: 1761295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tactual perception of speech-like stimuli with an electrocutaneous vocoder.
    Eilers RE; Bull DH; Oller DK
    Artif Organs; 1984 Nov; 8(4):494-7. PubMed ID: 6239611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Suppression of spatial localization of a cutaneous stimulus following transcranial magnetic pulse stimulation of the sensorimotor cortex.
    Seyal M; Siddiqui I; Hundal NS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Feb; 105(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9118835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stimulus parameters affecting paired-pulse depression of dentate granule cell field potentials. II. Low-frequency stimulation.
    Burdette LJ; Masukawa LM
    Brain Res; 1995 May; 680(1-2):63-72. PubMed ID: 7663985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Characterization of evoked tactile sensation in forearm amputees with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
    Chai G; Sui X; Li S; He L; Lan N
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066002. PubMed ID: 26401550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods.
    Lindenblatt G; Silny J
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Dec; 7(12):933-46. PubMed ID: 17111461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electric parameters optimization in spinal cord stimulation. Study in conventional nonrechargeable systems.
    Abejón D; Cameron T; Feler C; Pérez-Cajaraville J
    Neuromodulation; 2010 Oct; 13(4):281-6; discussion 286-7. PubMed ID: 21992883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Strength-Duration Relationship in Paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Its Implications for Repetitive TMS.
    Shirota Y; Sommer M; Paulus W
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(5):755-761. PubMed ID: 27234142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of tactile stimulation pulse characteristics on sensation threshold and power consumption.
    Nunziata E; Perez C; Jarmul E; Lipetz LE; Weed HR
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(4):423-35. PubMed ID: 2774316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimization of single electrode tactile codes.
    Szeto AY; Farrenkopf GR
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1992; 20(6):647-65. PubMed ID: 1449232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conductivities of pig dermis and subcutaneous fat measured with rectangular pulse electrical current.
    Cheng K; Tarjan PP; Mertz PM
    Bioelectromagnetics; 1996; 17(6):458-66. PubMed ID: 8986363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relationships between touch sensations and estimated population responses of peripheral afferent mechanoreceptors.
    Cohen RH; Vierck CJ
    Exp Brain Res; 1993; 94(1):120-30. PubMed ID: 8335067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Enhancing tactile sensation in older adults with electrical noise stimulation.
    Dhruv NT; Niemi JB; Harry JD; Lipsitz LA; Collins JJ
    Neuroreport; 2002 Apr; 13(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 11973453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Acute vagus nerve stimulation using different pulse widths produces varying brain effects.
    Mu Q; Bohning DE; Nahas Z; Walker J; Anderson B; Johnson KA; Denslow S; Lomarev M; Moghadam P; Chae JH; George MS
    Biol Psychiatry; 2004 Apr; 55(8):816-25. PubMed ID: 15050863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary somatosensory cortex differentially modulates perception and sensorimotor transformations.
    Meehan SK; Legon W; Staines WR
    Neuroscience; 2008 Nov; 157(2):424-31. PubMed ID: 18838111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.