198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4074904)
1. The judge's view of competency evaluations.
Owens H; Rosner R; Harmon RB
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 4074904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The ethical practice of forensic psychiatry: a view from the trenches.
Ciccone JR; Clements CD
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):263-77. PubMed ID: 6478069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Older people.
Yorston G
Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14 Suppl 1():S56-7. PubMed ID: 16575791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A new pretrial screening program.
Rappeport JR; Conti NP; Rudnick B
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 6640118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In defense of the insanity defense.
Beigel H
Hillside J Clin Psychiatry; 1983; 5(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 6662497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Guilty but mentally ill--in search of a perspective.
Ermutlu IM
J Med Assoc Ga; 1983 May; 72(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 6864120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Treating the not guilty by reason of insanity outpatient: a two-year study.
Cavanaugh JL; Wasyliw OE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 4074906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychiatrists and the insanity defense.
Rotenberg LA
Pa Med; 1983 Sep; 86(9):48-9. PubMed ID: 6685857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Opinions concerning the insanity plea and criminality among mental patients.
Pasewark RA; Seidenzahl D
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 540170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.
Dolan B
Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14 Suppl 1():S12-8. PubMed ID: 16575810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Insanity defense continues to draw attention in Washington, state capitols.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1983 Jan; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 6826158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Insanity plea in Connecticut.
Phillips BL; Pasewark RA
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 7284609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Forensic psychiatry in Taiwan.
Kuo SH
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(3-4):457-72. PubMed ID: 6679535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. When doctors disagree: differing views on competency.
Goldstein RL; Stone M
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1977; 5(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 912125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Disposition of insanity defense cases in Oregon.
Bloom JL; Bloom JD
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 7317657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence and treatment of personality disorders in Dutch forensic mental health services.
de Ruiter C; Trestman RL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 17389350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.
Dolan B
Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14(2 Suppl):S12-8. PubMed ID: 23570119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Georgia Court Competency Test: the base-rate problem.
Wildman RW; White PA; Brandenburg CE
Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):1055-8. PubMed ID: 2377402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Crime and the insanity defense, an international comparison: Ontario and New York state.
Greenland C
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 231986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Further comments on the insanity defense in the aftermath of the Hinckley trial.
Halpern AL
Psychiatr Q; 1984; 56(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 6522530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
