116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4077439)
21. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital selenium radiography: anti-scatter grid for chest radiography in a clinical study.
Bernhardt TM; Rapp-Bernhardt U; Hausmann T; Reichel G; Krause UW; Doehring W
Br J Radiol; 2000 Sep; 73(873):963-8. PubMed ID: 11064649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of varying high pass filter parameters on the detectability of isolated pulmonary nodules in digitized chest images.
Foley WD; Wilson CR; San Dretto M
Invest Radiol; 1986 Apr; 21(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 3700043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of Software Parameter Settings on Image Quality of Virtual Grid Processed Radiography Images: A Contrast-Detail Phantom Study.
Gossye T; Smeets PV; Achten E; Bacher K
Invest Radiol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):374-380. PubMed ID: 31985603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Smith A; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140613. PubMed ID: 25571914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Posterior beam-stop method for scatter fraction measurement in digital radiography.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Lo JY; Ravin CE
Invest Radiol; 1992 Feb; 27(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 1601602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Rejection and redistribution of scattered radiation in scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR): simulation with spot images.
Liu X; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2718-29. PubMed ID: 17821980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative scatter and dose performance of slot-scan and full-field digital chest radiography systems.
Samei E; Lo JY; Yoshizumi TT; Jesneck JL; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; McAdams HP; Ravin CE
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):940-9. PubMed ID: 15845791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Scatter fractions in AMBER imaging.
Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Ravin CE
Radiology; 1990 Dec; 177(3):879-80. PubMed ID: 2244003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of low-scatter chest radiographs.
Sorenson JA; Mitchell CR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Aug; 149(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3496751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bayesian restoration of chest radiographs. Scatter compensation with improved signal-to-noise ratio.
Floyd CE; Baydush AH; Lo JY; Bowsher JE; Ravin CE
Invest Radiol; 1994 Oct; 29(10):904-10. PubMed ID: 7852042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A scanning system for chest radiography with regional exposure control: practical implementation.
Plewes DB; Vogelstein E
Med Phys; 1983; 10(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 6646071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System.
Goodman LR; Foley WD; Wilson CR; Rimm AA; Lawson TL
Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 3940392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. EVALUATION OF DOSE REDUCTION POTENTIALS OF A NOVEL SCATTER CORRECTION SOFTWARE FOR BEDSIDE CHEST X-RAY IMAGING.
Renger B; Brieskorn C; Toth V; Mentrup D; Jockel S; Lohöfer F; Schwarz M; Rummeny EJ; Noël PB
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):60-7. PubMed ID: 26977074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Slot technique--an alternative method of scatter reduction in radiography.
Panzer W; Widenmann L
Radiography; 1983 Jun; 49(582):141-5. PubMed ID: 6878653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transmission characteristics of a two dimensional antiscatter grid prototype for CBCT.
Altunbas C; Kavanagh B; Alexeev T; Miften M
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3952-3964. PubMed ID: 28513847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency.
Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Pattacini P; Ginocchi V; Iori M
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2617-27. PubMed ID: 22559632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
