These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4079359)

  • 1. Structural models for human spinal motion segments based on a poroelastic view of the intervertebral disk.
    Simon BR; Wu JS; Carlton MW; Evans JH; Kazarian LE
    J Biomech Eng; 1985 Nov; 107(4):327-35. PubMed ID: 4079359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Poroelastic dynamic structural models of rhesus spinal motion segments.
    Simon BR; Wu JS; Carlton MW; Kazarian LE; France EP; Evans JH; Zienkiewicz OC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1985; 10(6):494-507. PubMed ID: 4081864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clarification of the mechanical behaviour of spinal motion segments through a three-dimensional poroelastic mixed finite element model.
    Wu JS; Chen JH
    Med Eng Phys; 1996 Apr; 18(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 8718947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dependence of mechanical behavior of the murine tail disc on regional material properties: a parametric finite element study.
    Hsieh AH; Wagner DR; Cheng LY; Lotz JC
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Dec; 127(7):1158-67. PubMed ID: 16502658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical and fluid flowing characteristics of intervertebral disc of lumbar spine predicted by poroelastic finite element method.
    Guo LX; Li R; Zhang M
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2016; 18(2):19-29. PubMed ID: 27406902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of endplates in contributing to compression behaviors of motion segments and intervertebral discs.
    MacLean JJ; Owen JP; Iatridis JC
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 16427060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical influence of disk properties on the load transfer of healthy and degenerated disks using a poroelastic finite element model.
    Chagnon A; Aubin CE; Villemure I
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Nov; 132(11):111006. PubMed ID: 21034147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanics of load-bearing of the intervertebral disc: an experimental and finite element model.
    Martinez JB; Oloyede VO; Broom ND
    Med Eng Phys; 1997 Mar; 19(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 9203149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical response of intact, degenerated and repaired intervertebral discs under impact loading - Ex-vivo and In-Silico investigation.
    Nikkhoo M; Wang JL; Parnianpour M; El-Rich M; Khalaf K
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():26-32. PubMed ID: 29397111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling changes in intervertebral disc mechanics with degeneration.
    Natarajan RN; Williams JR; Andersson GB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Apr; 88 Suppl 2():36-40. PubMed ID: 16595441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intervertebral disc creep behavior assessment through an open source finite element solver.
    Castro AP; Wilson W; Huyghe JM; Ito K; Alves JL
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):297-301. PubMed ID: 24210477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Osmoviscoelastic finite element model of the intervertebral disc.
    Schroeder Y; Wilson W; Huyghe JM; Baaijens FP
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Aug; 15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S361-71. PubMed ID: 16724211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An experimental and finite element poroelastic creep response analysis of an intervertebral hydrogel disc model in axial compression.
    Silva P; Crozier S; Veidt M; Pearcy MJ
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2005 Jul; 16(7):663-9. PubMed ID: 15965599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of four methods to simulate swelling in poroelastic finite element models of intervertebral discs.
    Galbusera F; Schmidt H; Noailly J; Malandrino A; Lacroix D; Wilke HJ; Shirazi-Adl A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 4(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 21783132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inclusion of regional poroelastic material properties better predicts biomechanical behavior of lumbar discs subjected to dynamic loading.
    Williams JR; Natarajan RN; Andersson GB
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(9):1981-7. PubMed ID: 17156786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-dependent compressive deformation of the ageing spine: relevance to spinal stenosis.
    Pollintine P; van Tunen MS; Luo J; Brown MD; Dolan P; Adams MA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 20110846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of different material theories used in a FE model of a lumbar segment motion.
    Gohari E; Nikkhoo M; Haghpanahi M; Parnianpour M
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2013; 15(2):33-41. PubMed ID: 23952458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanics of the lumbar intervertebral disk: a review.
    Jensen GM
    Phys Ther; 1980 Jun; 60(6):765-73. PubMed ID: 6445569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Progressive disc degeneration at C5-C6 segment affects the mechanics between disc heights and posterior facets above and below the degenerated segment: A flexion-extension investigation using a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model.
    Hussain M; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Jun; 34(5):552-8. PubMed ID: 21925919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo creep behavior of the normal and degenerated porcine intervertebral disk: a preliminary report.
    Keller TS; Hansson TH; Holm SH; Pope MM; Spengler DM
    J Spinal Disord; 1988; 1(4):267-78. PubMed ID: 2980254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.