These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4079450)

  • 21. Within-population variation in female mating preference affects the opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of male traits, but things are not as simple as expected.
    Millan CH; Machado G; Muniz DG
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Nov; 33(11):1579-1592. PubMed ID: 32871625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reinforcement during ecological speciation.
    Kirkpatrick M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jun; 268(1473):1259-63. PubMed ID: 11410152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Continual change in mate preferences.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Nature; 1995 Oct; 377(6548):420-2. PubMed ID: 7566117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Lande-Kirkpatrick mechanism is the null model of evolution by intersexual selection: implications for meaning, honesty, and design in intersexual signals.
    Prum RO
    Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3085-100. PubMed ID: 20633044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Direct selection on male attractiveness and female preference fails to produce a response.
    Hall M; Lindholm AK; Brooks R
    BMC Evol Biol; 2004 Jan; 4():1. PubMed ID: 14720309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating the post-copulatory sexual selection hypothesis for genital evolution reveals evidence for pleiotropic harm exerted by the male genital spines of Drosophila ananassae.
    Grieshop K; Polak M
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Dec; 27(12):2676-86. PubMed ID: 25403358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sexual selection and interacting phenotypes in experimental evolution: a study of Drosophila pseudoobscura mating behavior.
    Bacigalupe LD; Crudgington HS; Slate J; Moore AJ; Snook RR
    Evolution; 2008 Jul; 62(7):1804-1812. PubMed ID: 18410532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection.
    Edward DA; Fricke C; Chapman T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Aug; 365(1552):2541-8. PubMed ID: 20643744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sexual selection for size and symmetry in a diversifying secondary sexual character in Drosophila bipectinata Duda (Diptera: Drosophilidae).
    Polak M; Starmer WT; Wolf LL
    Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):597-607. PubMed ID: 15119443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.
    Houle D; Kondrashov AS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jan; 269(1486):97-104. PubMed ID: 11788042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mutation-order divergence by sexual selection: diversification of sexual signals in similar environments as a first step in speciation.
    Mendelson TC; Martin MD; Flaxman SM
    Ecol Lett; 2014 Sep; 17(9):1053-66. PubMed ID: 24943881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection.
    Chenoweth SF; Rundle HD; Blows MW
    Am Nat; 2008 Jan; 171(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 18171148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Condition dependence and the maintenance of genetic variance in a sexually dimorphic black scavenger fly.
    Dmitriew C; Blanckenhorn WU
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2408-19. PubMed ID: 25345564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The handicap process favors exaggerated, rather than reduced, sexual ornaments.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Sep; 68(9):2534-49. PubMed ID: 24837599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism.
    Albert AY; Otto SP
    Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5745):119-21. PubMed ID: 16210543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 21361917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Revisiting Santa Rosalia to unfold a degeneracy of classic models of speciation.
    NorvaiĊĦas P; Kisdi E
    Am Nat; 2012 Sep; 180(3):388-93. PubMed ID: 22854081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition.
    Blows MW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jun; 269(1496):1113-8. PubMed ID: 12061953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila.
    Kelly JK; Noor MA
    Genetics; 1996 Jul; 143(3):1485-97. PubMed ID: 8807317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The genetic basis of traits regulating sperm competition and polyandry: can selection favour the evolution of good- and sexy-sperm?
    Evans JP; Simmons LW
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 17619174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.