These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4080134)
41. [Consequences of the mechanization of medicine]. Kumate-Rodríguez J; Brust-Carmona H; Uribe-Elías R Gac Med Mex; 1990; 126(6):537-57. PubMed ID: 1983308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Cost escalation in health-care technology--possible solutions. Járos GG; Boonzaier DA S Afr Med J; 1993 Jun; 83(6):420-2. PubMed ID: 8211460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [The Danish Health Technology Assessment model. A systematic review of Danish HTAs published by CEMTV from 1998 to 2004]. Draborg EU Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(21):2074-8. PubMed ID: 16768927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The diffusion of the computed tomography (CT) scanner in the United States. Banta HD Int J Health Serv; 1980; 10(2):251-69. PubMed ID: 7372384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The CFO's role in determining the business impact and capital financing for medical technologies. Chadwick EG Hosp Health Netw; 2008 May; 82(5):suppl 8. PubMed ID: 18557341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Challenging healthcare economics and technology to save the environment. Paech M Int Nurs Rev; 1991; 38(4):111-4. PubMed ID: 1917362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Legal interfaces in telemedicine technology. Lott CM Mil Med; 1996 May; 161(5):280-3. PubMed ID: 8855060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The Joint Commission's Agenda for Change: what does it mean for equipment managers? Keil OR Biomed Instrum Technol; 1994; 28(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 8136865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. When and how to assess fast-changing technologies: a comparative study of medical applications of four generic technologies. Mowatt G; Bower DJ; Brebner JA; Cairns JA; Grant AM; McKee L Health Technol Assess; 1997; 1(14):i-vi, 1-149. PubMed ID: 9483162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The migration offshore of U.S. medical technology innovation--what it means for U.S. physicians. Loarie TM J Refract Surg; 1997; 13(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 9109076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The impact of technology on health care costs. Cotterill PG Profile Med Pract; 1980; ():107-21. PubMed ID: 10309443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The impact of DRG-based prospective payment on clinical decision making. Williams SV Med Decis Making; 1985; 5(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 3934489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Medical technologies: concern about and assurance of value. McNeil BJ Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():S257-8. PubMed ID: 9750825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Group decision making by experts: field study of panels evaluating medical technologies. Vinokur A; Burnstein E; Sechrest L; Wortman PM J Pers Soc Psychol; 1985 Jul; 49(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 4020617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [New technologies in neurosurgery]. Konovalov AN Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 1999; (9):52-4. PubMed ID: 10523990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Health technology assessment--principles, pointers and problems. Caine N Perfusion; 1997 Jul; 12(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 9234401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Technology assessment: an international perspective. Martin DL Dimens Health Serv; 1983 Apr; 60(4):33. PubMed ID: 6133805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. On technology, science, and tea: what are we doing and why? Ausman JI Surg Neurol; 2001 Dec; 56(6):406-7. PubMed ID: 11755981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]