129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4080650)
1. Grading of prostatic cancer: III. Multivariate analysis of prognostic parameters.
Schroeder FH; Hop WC; Blom JH; Mostofi FK
Prostate; 1985; 7(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 4080650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grading of prostatic cancer: II. The prognostic significance of the presence of multiple architectural patterns.
Schroeder FH; Blom JH; Hop WC; Mostofi FK
Prostate; 1985; 6(4):403-15. PubMed ID: 4088953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Grading of prostatic cancer (I): An analysis of the prognostic significance of single characteristics.
Schroeder FH; Blom JH; Hop WC; Mostofi FK
Prostate; 1985; 6(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 3969374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histological evaluation of prostatic cancer. (II): Reproducibility of a histological grading system.
Svanholm H; Starklint H; Barlebo H; Olsen S
APMIS; 1990 Mar; 98(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 2317346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histological grading of prostatic carcinoma in prostatectomy specimens. Comparison of prognostic accuracy of five grading systems.
Gallee MP; Ten Kate FJ; Mulder PG; Blom JH; van der Heul RO
Br J Urol; 1990 Apr; 65(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2340371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Correlation between histologic grading and prognosis of prostatic cancer--comparing the grading system of the Japanese general rules of prostatic cancer with Gleason's grading].
Hioki T; Sugimura Y; Sakurai M; Hayashi N; Tochigi H; Kawamura J; Yatani R
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Aug; 36(8):921-6. PubMed ID: 2239593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Significance and outcome of nuclear anaplasia and mitotic index in prostatic adenocarcinomas.
Kır G; Sarbay BC; Gumus E
Urol Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):430.e9-430.e16. PubMed ID: 27264167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Prognostic significance of prostatic carcinoma grading according to Helpap].
Mahlke U; Ulman A; Kunz J
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 1993; 77():82-5. PubMed ID: 7511308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic significance of histologic grading in patients with prostate carcinoma who are assessed by the Gleason and World Health Organization grading systems in needle biopsies obtained prior to radiotherapy.
Lilleby W; Torlakovic G; Torlakovic E; Skovlund E; Fosså SD
Cancer; 2001 Jul; 92(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 11466684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma.
Böcking A; Sinagowitz E
Pathol Res Pract; 1980; 168(1-3):115-25. PubMed ID: 7433250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histopathology of localized prostate cancer. Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Prognostic Parameters in Localized Prostate Cancer. Stockholm, Sweden, May 12-13, 1993.
Murphy GP; Busch C; Abrahamsson PA; Epstein JI; McNeal JE; Miller GJ; Mostofi FK; Nagle RB; Nordling S; Parkinson C
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1994; 162():7-42; discussion 115-27. PubMed ID: 7817162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphometrically estimated variation in nuclear size. A useful tool in grading prostatic cancer.
Blom JH; Ten Kate FJ; Schroeder FH; van der Heul RO
Urol Res; 1990; 18(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 2187298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnostic and prognostic significance of cytological malignancy grading of prostatic carcinoma].
Faul P
Urologe A; 1983 May; 22(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 6683896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward objective prognostic grading of prostatic carcinoma using image analysis.
Irinopoulou T; Rigaut JP; Benson MC
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1993 Oct; 15(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 8259975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical and pathological study of 152 cases of prostatic cancer].
Kondoh I; Miura T; Shimura H; Harada M; Fujii H
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1992 Jun; 38(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 1632321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer: from Gleason scoring to prognostic grade grouping.
Montironi R; Santoni M; Mazzucchelli R; Burattini L; Berardi R; Galosi AB; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Scarpelli M
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2016; 16(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 27008205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic criteria in patients with stage D2 prostate cancer. Correlation with mean nuclear volume.
Fujikawa K; Sasaki M; Aoyama T; Itoh T
Cancer; 1995 Jul; 76(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 8630882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
