BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4081407)

  • 1. [Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests].
    Smets P
    Rev Med Brux; 1985 Sep; 6(7):451-4. PubMed ID: 4081407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Studies about diagnostic tests: interpreting the results].
    Salech F; Mery V; Larrondo F; Rada G
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Sep; 136(9):1203-8. PubMed ID: 19030668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard.
    Hawkins DM; Garrett JA; Stephenson B
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1987-2001. PubMed ID: 11427955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proteomics and cancer: running before we can walk?
    Check E
    Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):496-7. PubMed ID: 15175721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating validity of screening tests.
    Larson E
    Nurs Res; 1986; 35(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 3635057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
    Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M; Cunningham J; Matsoso P; Nathanson CM; Olliaro P; Peeling RW; Ramsay A;
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 4(12 Suppl):S20-32. PubMed ID: 17366684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
    Bowden SC; Loring DW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The quality of measurement methods and its statistical estimation].
    Läärä E; Aro S
    Duodecim; 1988; 104(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 3409823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous comparison of sensitivity and specificity of two tests in the paired design: a straightforward graphical approach.
    Newcombe RG
    Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(6):907-15. PubMed ID: 11252012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re: Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
    Formann AK; Böhning D
    Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):777-8. PubMed ID: 18718923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to improve the quality of waived tests.
    Mitchell B; Murray C
    Fam Pract Manag; 2006 Oct; 13(9):49-52. PubMed ID: 17076111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tests in Tokyo reveal flaws in Vietnam's bird flu surveillance.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2005 Feb; 433(7028):787. PubMed ID: 15729299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pitfalls of internet-accessible diagnostic tests: inadequate performance of a CE-marked Chlamydia test for home use.
    Michel CE; Saison FG; Joshi H; Mahilum-Tapay LM; Lee HH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Jun; 85(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 19398434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Performance evaluation (validation) of diagnosis].
    Röding H; Schenke K
    Zentralbl Chir; 1987; 112(16):1001-10. PubMed ID: 3673309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overlap index. An alternative to sensitivity and specificity in comparing the Utility of a laboratory test.
    Hartz AJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1984 Jan; 108(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 6546340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A guide for diagnostic evaluations.
    Peeling RW; Smith PG; Bossuyt PM
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 4(12 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 17110921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are reporting standards of diagnostic test evaluation unrealistic?
    Lassere M
    J Rheumatol; 2010 Feb; 37(2):220-2. PubMed ID: 20147476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Systematic reviews in practice. X. Searching, selecting and the methodological assessment of diagnostic evaluation research].
    Devillé WL; Bossuyt PM; de Vet HC; Bezemer PD; Bouter LM; Assendelft WJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Nov; 146(48):2281-4. PubMed ID: 12497754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Urine analysis: current performance and strategies for improvement.
    Fraser CG
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Aug; 291(6491):321-3. PubMed ID: 3926181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.