These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4083070)

  • 1. Radiation dosimetry in tomography of the teeth and jaws using a multi-film cassette.
    Borglin K; Petersson A; Rohlin M; Thapper K
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(6):739-43. PubMed ID: 4083070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography.
    Ekestubbe A; Thilander A; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 8508935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation dosimetry in radiology of the temporomandibular joint.
    Borglin K; Petersson A; Rohlin M; Thapper K
    Br J Radiol; 1984 Nov; 57(683):997-1007. PubMed ID: 6535627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Absorbed doses from spiral CT and conventional spiral tomography: a phantom vs. cadaver study.
    Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Bosmans H; Hermans R; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Oct; 12(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 11564107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Organ radiation dose assessment for conventional spiral tomography: a human cadaver study.
    Bou Serhal C; van Steenberghe D; Bosmans H; Sanderink GC; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 11168275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Absorbed doses and energy imparted from tomography for dental implant installation. Spiral tomography using the Scanora technique compared with hypocycloidal tomography.
    Ekestubbe A; Thilander A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 1397458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation-absorbed doses and energy imparted from panoramic tomography, cephalometric radiography, and occlusal film radiography in children.
    Bankvall G; Håkansson HA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 May; 53(5):532-40. PubMed ID: 6954429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques.
    Kassebaum DK; Stoller NE; McDavid WD; Goshorn B; Ahrens CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 1574314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
    Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Energy imparted from intraoral radiography.
    Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Karlsson L; Sarby B
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(4):125-36. PubMed ID: 3466375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose contributions to the Swedish population from oral radiography.
    Stenström B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1986; 40():1-62. PubMed ID: 3467441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Absorbed doses with intraoral radiography. Function of various technical parameters.
    Hayakawa Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 8233434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exposure distribution, absorbed doses, and energy imparted for panoramic radiography using Orthopantomograph model OP 5.
    Nilsson L; Rohlin M; Thapper K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Feb; 59(2):212-9. PubMed ID: 3856810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Absorbed doses to critical organs from full mouth dental radiography].
    Zhang G; Yasuhiko O; Hidegiko Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 34(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11776538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics.
    Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Sokolowski TW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 7835511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Absorbed radiation doses during tomographic examinations in dental implant planning: a study in humans.
    Zenóbio EG; Zenóbio MA; Nogueira MS; Silva TA; Shibli JA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 20491821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT.
    Tsiklakis K; Donta C; Gavala S; Karayianni K; Kamenopoulou V; Hourdakis CJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 15978765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography.
    Scaf G; Lurie AG; Mosier KM; Kantor ML; Ramsby GR; Freedman ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jan; 83(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 9007922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduction of absorbed doses in radiography of the facial skeleton.
    Julin P; Kraepelien T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Nov; 143(5):1113-6. PubMed ID: 6333160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.