These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4085231)

  • 41. Nickel sensitivity: relationship between history and patch test reaction.
    Kieffer M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1979 Dec; 5(6):398-401. PubMed ID: 527333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Patch and prick test study of 593 healthy subjects.
    Seidenari S; Manzini BM; Danese P; Motolese A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Sep; 23(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 2282794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Chamber test versus patch test for epicutaneous testing.
    Pirilä V
    Contact Dermatitis; 1975; 1(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 1235071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Thimerosal positivities: patch testing to methylmercury chloride in subjects sensitive to ethylmercury chloride.
    Santucci B; Cannistraci C; Cristaudo A; Camera E; Picardo M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Jan; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9928798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Allergic reactions to Merthiolate (Thimerosal).
    Fisher AA
    Cutis; 1981 Jun; 27(6):580, 582, 587. PubMed ID: 6453701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A new method for intraoral patch testing.
    Axéll T; Spiechowicz E; Glantz PO; Andersson G; Larsson A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Aug; 15(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 3780206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The vehicle tray revisited: the use of the vehicle tray in assessing allergic contact dermatitis by a 24-hour application method.
    Iden DL; Schroeter AL
    Contact Dermatitis; 1977 Jun; 3(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 891174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Mercury as a contact allergen.
    Wekkeli M; Hippmann G; Rosenkranz AR; Jarisch R; Götz M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 May; 22(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 2383989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Severe allergic reaction to saline preserved with thimerosal.
    Zadnik K
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1984 Jul; 55(7):507-9. PubMed ID: 6747183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of organic and inorganic mercury distribution in suckling rat.
    Orct T; Blanusa M; Lazarus M; Varnai VM; Kostial K
    J Appl Toxicol; 2006; 26(6):536-9. PubMed ID: 17080402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of cutaneous hypersensitivity to aluminum by routine patch testing with A1C1(3).
    Hemmer W; Wantke F; Focke M; Gotz M; Jarisch R
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Mar; 34(3):217-8. PubMed ID: 8833470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Why thimerosal allergy?
    Möller H
    Int J Dermatol; 1980; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 7358436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Patch tests: advantages and undesirable effects].
    Angelini G; Meneghini CL
    G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 1986; 121(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 3744430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Allergy to non-toxoid constituents of vaccines and implications for patch testing.
    Cox NH; Moss C; Forsyth A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Mar; 18(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 3365966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Thiomersal allergy and vaccination reactions.
    Cox NH; Forsyth A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Apr; 18(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 3378430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Trends in allergic contact sensitization.
    Gollhausen R; Enders F; Przybilla B; Burg G; Ring J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Mar; 18(3):147-54. PubMed ID: 3365967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Letter: False-negative reaction to patch testing with volatile compounds.
    Vail JT
    Arch Dermatol; 1974 Jul; 110(1):130. PubMed ID: 4419928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Finn chamber patch test technique.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Sep; 11(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 6499413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Oral lichenoid lesions caused by allergy to mercury in amalgam fillings.
    Pang BK; Freeman S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Dec; 33(6):423-7. PubMed ID: 8706402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Duhring chamber. An improved technique for epicutaneous testing of irritant and allergic reactions.
    Frosch PJ; Kligman AM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1979 Mar; 5(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 467029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.