These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4085703)

  • 1. Audit: a project on peer review in general practice.
    Grol R; van Eijk J; Mesker P; Schellevis F
    Fam Pract; 1985 Dec; 2(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 4085703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experiences with self-assessment and peer review among general practitioners in The Netherlands.
    Crebolder HF
    Aust Clin Rev; 1987 Mar; 7(24):32-5. PubMed ID: 3566645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
    McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective audit in general practice: a method for systematically developing audit protocols containing evidence-based review criteria.
    Fraser RC; Khunti K; Baker R; Lakhani M
    Br J Gen Pract; 1997 Nov; 47(424):743-6. PubMed ID: 9519525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of peer review in general practice.
    Grol R; Mokkink H; Schellevis F
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Jan; 38(306):10-3. PubMed ID: 3204541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of the process of care. Experiences from The Netherlands and Canada.
    Steven ID
    Aust Fam Physician; 1990 Mar; 19(3):283-5. PubMed ID: 2334338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review. Part 1: Attitudes to internal and external standards.
    Tracey JM
    N Z Med J; 1991 Jan; 104(904):8-10. PubMed ID: 2008263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of computer-aided and human review of general practitioners' management of hypertension.
    van der Lei J; Musen MA; van der Does E; Man in 't Veld AJ; van Bemmel JH
    Lancet; 1991 Dec; 338(8781):1504-8. PubMed ID: 1683929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditing audits: the method of Oxfordshire Medical Audit Advisory Group.
    Derry J; Lawrence M; Griew K; Anderson J; Humphreys J; Pandher KS
    BMJ; 1991 Nov; 303(6812):1247-9. PubMed ID: 1836150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of audit and feedback with peer review on general practitioners' prescribing and test ordering performance: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.
    Trietsch J; van Steenkiste B; Grol R; Winkens B; Ulenkate H; Metsemakers J; van der Weijden T
    BMC Fam Pract; 2017 Apr; 18(1):53. PubMed ID: 28407754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Update: PSRO transmittal. Peer review by health care practitioners other than physicians.
    Rogers J
    Med Rec News; 1977 Apr; 48(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 10305612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical audit by peer review and competitive self-appraisal as tools for promoting efficiency: a case study in Lahore, Pakistan.
    Awan AK; Awan AH; Akhtar R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Sep; 30(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 2572468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementation of quality assurance and medical audit: general practitioners' perceived obstacles and requirements.
    Grol R; Wensing M
    Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Oct; 45(399):548-52. PubMed ID: 7492425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. General practitioner experience of clinical self audit.
    Nelson M; Piterman L
    Aust Fam Physician; 1998 Jan; 27 Suppl 1():S34-8. PubMed ID: 9503734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audit reviewed. Clinical review: a form of audit?
    van't Hoff W
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1981 Jan; 15(1):63. PubMed ID: 7463388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditing the management of hypertension in British general practice: a critical literature review.
    Cranney M; Barton S; Walley T
    Br J Gen Pract; 1998 Jul; 48(432):1424-8. PubMed ID: 9800405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological issues associated with an audit of stillbirth in a family medicine practice in Israel.
    Furst AL; Shamba E
    Fam Pract; 1989 Sep; 6(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 2792616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experience in medical audit: general practice.
    Baker R
    Postgrad Med J; 1990; 66 Suppl 3():S14-6. PubMed ID: 2247398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audit in general practice: students and practitioners learning together.
    Campion P; Stanley I; Haddleton M
    Qual Health Care; 1992 Jun; 1(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 10136840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Peer review in a hospital: the selective use of packed cells for transfusions as a topic of prospective quality control].
    Casparie AF; Reerink E
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1977 Apr; 121(16):666-70. PubMed ID: 854110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.