These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4085703)

  • 21. Information systems for general practitioners for quality assessment: I. Responses of the doctors.
    Fraser RC; Gosling JT
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Nov; 291(6507):1473-6. PubMed ID: 3933715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The assessment of criterion audit cycles by external peer review - when is an audit not an audit?
    Bowie P; Cooke S; Lo P; McKay J; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Jun; 13(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 17518798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aspects of audit. 1. The background.
    Shaw CD
    Br Med J; 1980 May; 280(6226):1256-8. PubMed ID: 7388496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A survey of audit activity in general practice.
    Hearnshaw H; Baker R; Cooper A
    Br J Gen Pract; 1998 Feb; 48(427):979-81. PubMed ID: 9624769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of vitamin B-12 in Leicestershire practices: a single topic audit led by a medical audit advisory group.
    Fraser RC; Farooqi A; Sorrie R
    BMJ; 1995 Jul; 311(6996):28-30. PubMed ID: 7613320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methodological problems in comparing audits from the Nordic countries. A critical review of results from audit on Nordic general practitioners' management of patients with psychiatric problems.
    Hansen DG; Munck AP; Kragstrup J
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2002 Jun; 20(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 12184715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Investigation into the attitudes of general practitioners in Staffordshire to medical audit.
    Chambers R; Bowyer S; Campbell I
    Qual Health Care; 1996 Mar; 5(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 10157267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accessibility, feasibility and educational impact of a peer review process for general practitioner consultation skills.
    McMillan R
    Qual Prim Care; 2012; 20(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 22824563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dutch treatise: peer review in general hospitals in the Netherlands.
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1977 Dec; 3(12):18-21. PubMed ID: 414188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Piloting online self-audit of methadone treatment in Irish general practice: results, reflections and educational outcomes.
    Van Hout MC; Crowley D; McBride A; Delargy I
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 18(1):153. PubMed ID: 29945578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nonjudgmental audit technique: motivating physicians in an audit of cholecystectomy.
    Coll JA; Finn G
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1978 Jun; 4(6):9-12. PubMed ID: 104247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Medical audit activity in primary and secondary care in the west of Scotland.
    Kinn SR; Smith PJ
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1996 May; 54(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 8707570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The concept of medical auditing.
    Crooks J
    Acta Med Scand Suppl; 1984; 683():47-52. PubMed ID: 6588738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A qualitative study of why general practitioners may participate in significant event analysis and educational peer assessment.
    Bowie P; McKay J; Dalgetty E; Lough M
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2005 Jun; 14(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 15933315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Audit in general practice: factors influencing participation.
    Baker R; Robertson N; Farooqi A
    BMJ; 1995 Jul; 311(6996):31-4. PubMed ID: 7613323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A method for introducing standardized (simulated) patients into general practice consultations.
    Rethans JJ; Drop R; Sturmans F; van der Vleuten C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Mar; 41(344):94-6. PubMed ID: 2031766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the end user (dentist) experience of undertaking clinical audit in the post April 2001 general dental services (GDS) scheme.
    Cannell PJ
    Br Dent J; 2012 Sep; 213(5):E7. PubMed ID: 22955789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Who needs clinical audit?
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH
    Int Dent J; 1994 Oct; 44(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 7814122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. General issues in quality assurance.
    Legge D
    Aust Clin Rev; 1984 Sep; (14):14-20. PubMed ID: 6517753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effectiveness of an enhanced peer assessment program: introducing education into regulatory assessment.
    Wenghofer EF; Way D; Moxam RS; Wu H; Faulkner D; Klass DJ
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2006; 26(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 16986145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.