These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4087893)

  • 1. Effects of feedback filtering on nasalization and self-perception of nasality.
    Burzynski CM; Starr CD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):585-8. PubMed ID: 4087893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of feedback filtering on nasalization in normal and hypernasal speakers.
    Garber SR; Moller KT
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Jun; 22(2):321-33. PubMed ID: 491559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regulation of vocal intensity in the presence of feedback filtering and amplification.
    Garber SR; Siegel GM; Pick HL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Mar; 24(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 7253615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal characteristics of nasalization in speakers with and without cleft palate.
    Ha S; Kuehn DP
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Mar; 48(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 20536373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voice low tone to high tone ratio, nasalance, and nasality ratings in connected speech of native Mandarin speakers: a pilot study.
    Tsai YJ; Wang CP; Lee GS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Jul; 49(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 21740178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: evidence for partial compensation.
    Beddor PS; Krakow RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2868-87. PubMed ID: 10573902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voice Quality in Native and Foreign Languages Investigated by Inverse Filtering and Perceptual Analyses.
    Järvinen K; Laukkanen AM; Geneid A
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):261.e25-261.e31. PubMed ID: 27495969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech rate reduction and "nasality" in normal speakers.
    Brancewicz TM; Reich AR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):837-48. PubMed ID: 2601314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of spectral content on Horii Oral-Nasal Coupling scores in children.
    Varghese LA; Mendoza JO; Braden MN; Stepp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1295. PubMed ID: 25190402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Altered Auditory Feedback on Oral-Nasal Balance in Speakers of Brazilian Portuguese.
    de Boer G; Marino V; Berti L; Fabron E; Spazzapan EA; Bressmann T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3752-3762. PubMed ID: 31639320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observations on hearing aid users' strategies for controlling the level of their own voice.
    Laugesen S; Nielsen C; Maas P; Jensen NS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):503-13. PubMed ID: 19764170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory and visual feedback of nasalization using a modified accelerometric method.
    Horii Y; Monroe N
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):472-5. PubMed ID: 6645474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of voice style, noise level, and acoustic feedback on objective and subjective voice evaluations.
    Bottalico P; Graetzer S; Hunter EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):EL498-503. PubMed ID: 26723357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responses of Middle-Frequency Modulations in Vocal Fundamental Frequency to Different Vocal Intensities and Auditory Feedback.
    Lee SH; Fang TJ; Yu JF; Lee GS
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):536-544. PubMed ID: 28268129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of low-pass filtering and random splicing on the perception of speech.
    van Bezooijen R; Boves L
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1986 Sep; 15(5):403-17. PubMed ID: 3772832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in vocal resonance and nasalization following adenoidectomy in normal children: preliminary findings.
    Andreassen ML; Leeper HA; MacRae DL
    J Otolaryngol; 1991 Aug; 20(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 1920574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.
    Wolfe VI; Martin DP; Palmer CI
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 10877439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multidimensional scaling of nasal voice quality.
    Zraick RI; Liss JM; Dorman MF; Case JL; LaPointe LL; Beals SP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):989-96. PubMed ID: 11386484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic and perceptual correlates of the non-nasal--nasal distinction for vowels.
    Hawkins S; Stevens KN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1560-75. PubMed ID: 3989111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pre- and posttreatment voice and speech outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy: expert listeners' and patient's perception.
    van der Molen L; van Rossum MA; Jacobi I; van Son RJ; Smeele LE; Rasch CR; Hilgers FJ
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):664.e25-33. PubMed ID: 22209059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.