These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4088049)
1. On visual access to letter case and lexical/semantic information. Avant LL; Thieman AA Mem Cognit; 1985 Sep; 13(5):392-404. PubMed ID: 4088049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Orthographic and lexical processing of visual letter strings. Marmurek HH; Briscoe G Can J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 36(3):368-87. PubMed ID: 7172127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Repetition, semantic priming, and stimulus quality: implications for the interactive-compensatory reading model. Durgunoglu AY J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):590-603. PubMed ID: 2972798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of lateral masking and orthographic structure in letter and word recognition. Massaro DW; Klitzke D Acta Psychol (Amst); 1979 Sep; 43(5):413-26. PubMed ID: 495176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Geometric and semantic similarity in visual masking. Jacobson JZ; Rhinelander G J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 May; 4(2):224-31. PubMed ID: 660097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visually-presented letter strings typically are encoded phonologically: some converging evidence. Chastain G J Gen Psychol; 1987 Apr; 114(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 3585296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Searching for a pre-specified target letter in briefly displayed words and unpronounceable non-words. Solman RT Acta Psychol (Amst); 1981 Dec; 49(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 7324999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. Becker CA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 528937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks. Marmurek HH Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2761406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of graphemic and phonemic similarity between targets and masks in a backward visual masking paradigm. Naish P Q J Exp Psychol; 1980 Feb; 32(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 7367578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Detectionless processing with semantic activation? A footnote to Greenwald, Klinger, and Liu (1989). Doyle JR Mem Cognit; 1990 Jul; 18(4):428-9. PubMed ID: 2381321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition. Hatta T Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Developmental and reading ability differences in accessing information from semantic memory. Chabot RJ; Petros TV; McCord G J Exp Child Psychol; 1983 Feb; 35(1):128-42. PubMed ID: 6827213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. More about the letter-frequency effect. Mason M Percept Psychophys; 1982 Jun; 31(6):589-90. PubMed ID: 7122197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: a comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Grainger J; Segui J Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 2304817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of masked repetition priming and orthographic neighborhood in visual recognition of words. Perea M; Gotor A Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Aug; 83(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 8873189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual masking and unconscious processing: differences between backward and simultaneous masking? Greenwald AG; Klinger MR Mem Cognit; 1990 Jul; 18(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 2381322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Representation of letters when mislocation errors occur. Chastain G J Gen Psychol; 1990 Apr; 117(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2366047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]