These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Cardiac valve replacement in children: comparison of tissue with mechanical prostheses. Sade RM; Ballenger JF; Hohn AR; Arrants JE; Riopel DA; Taylor AB J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Jul; 78(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 571943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis. Mykén PS J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis. Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sound spectral analysis of prosthetic valvular clicks for diagnosis of thrombosed Björk-Shiley tilting standard disc valve prostheses. Sato N; Miura M; Itoh T; Ohmi M; Haneda K; Mohri H; Nitta S; Tanaka M J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 8429660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves. Gao G; Wu Y; Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Starr A J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new porcine bioprosthesis: design rationale and early clinical experience. Lemieux M; Dumesnil JG; Dowd C; Lutz D; Cartier P; Desaulniers D; Despres JP; Metras J; Raymond G Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):322-7. PubMed ID: 3179795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are allografts the biologic valve of choice for aortic valve replacement in nonelderly patients? Comparison of explantation for structural valve deterioration of allograft and pericardial prostheses. Smedira NG; Blackstone EH; Roselli EE; Laffey CC; Cosgrove DM J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Mar; 131(3):558-564.e4. PubMed ID: 16515905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study. Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis. Clinical experience and implantation characteristics. Jamieson WR; Gerein AN; Tyers GF; Janusz MT; Munro AI; Jyrala AJ; Miyagishima RT; Allen P J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Apr; 91(4):555-65. PubMed ID: 3959575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes? Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Selection criteria for aortic valve prostheses: mechanical, stented, or stentless valve or homograft?]. Koyanagi T; Minami K; Koerfer R Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Nov; 99(11):789-93. PubMed ID: 10028500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]