These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4088675)

  • 1. The effect of vertical differential prism on the binocular contrast sensitivity function.
    Tunnacliffe AH; Williams AT
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 4088675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of horizontal differential prism on the binocular contrast sensitivity function.
    Tunnacliffe AH; Williams AT
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 3748567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lateral short-term prism adaptation in clinical evaluation.
    Pickwell LD; Kurtz BH
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 3714278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses: mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions.
    Montés-Micó R; España E; Bueno I; Charman WN; Menezo JL
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Jan; 111(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 14711718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses.
    Trueb PR; Albach C; Montés-Micó R; Ferrer-Blasco T
    Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):890-5. PubMed ID: 19410947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of spherical aberration on visual function under photopic and mesopic conditions after cataract surgery.
    Yamaguchi T; Dogru M; Yamaguchi K; Ono T; Saiki M; Okuyama H; Tsubota K; Negishi K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 19101425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraindividual comparison of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses of same material and platform.
    Ohtani S; Miyata K; Samejima T; Honbou M; Oshika T
    Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):896-901. PubMed ID: 19410948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast sensitivity of wildtype mice wearing diffusers or spectacle lenses, and the effect of atropine.
    Schmucker C; Schaeffel F
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):678-87. PubMed ID: 15993919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wavefront aberrations, depth of focus, and contrast sensitivity with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: fellow-eye study.
    Nanavaty MA; Spalton DJ; Boyce J; Saha S; Marshall J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19304086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vernier acuity for stereodisparate objects and ocular prevalence.
    Heinrich SP; Kromeier M; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1321-8. PubMed ID: 15733964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vertical imbalance induced by prism-ballasted soft toric contact lenses fitted unilaterally.
    Nilsson M; Stevenson SB; Leach N; Bergmanson JP; Brautaset RL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Mar; 28(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 18339047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prism adaptation and viewing distance.
    North RV; Sethi B; Owen K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jan; 10(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 2330220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial scaling of the binocular capture effect.
    Raghunandan A; Anderson CS; Saladin JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 19182700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binocular summation of contrast remains intact in strabismic amblyopia.
    Baker DH; Meese TS; Mansouri B; Hess RF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Nov; 48(11):5332-8. PubMed ID: 17962490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual and optical performance of the Akreos Adapt Advanced Optics and Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lenses: Swedish multicenter study.
    Johansson B; Sundelin S; Wikberg-Matsson A; Unsbo P; Behndig A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1565-72. PubMed ID: 17720071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Associations of visual function with physical outcomes and limitations 5 years later in an older population: the Beaver Dam eye study.
    Klein BE; Moss SE; Klein R; Lee KE; Cruickshanks KJ
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Apr; 110(4):644-50. PubMed ID: 12689880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of myopia on contrast thresholds.
    Stoimenova BD
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 May; 48(5):2371-4. PubMed ID: 17460304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of differences between eyes on binocular measures of vision in patients with cataracts.
    Comas M; Castells X; Acosta ER; Tuñí J
    Eye (Lond); 2007 Jun; 21(6):702-7. PubMed ID: 16518364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax.
    Bradshaw MF; Hibbard PB; Parton AD; Rose D; Langley K
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2636-44. PubMed ID: 16571356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.